Great article. Unfortunately, Jessica's pneumonia chart isn't pneumonia versus covid, rather it is PIC (pneumonia, influenza and covid) versus covid. Hence the fantastic but misleading correspondence.
Forgive me, the Substack layout had changed and I pinned the wrong comment. Normally the triple dots menu is in the top right of a comment, but to pin yours, I had to click on the... bottom right? So when I tried to use the top right, I pinned the comment above yours, rather than yours specifically as I had intended.
In-fact, forgive my rambling, but wouldn't the pneumonia group "exclude" influenza in 2020 if we go by the 'official' narrative?
Remember, flu cases dropped to zero (supposedly, if we trust the 'official' numbers; personally I don't but what competing figures can I source?), so it wouldn't be possible for influenza to be part of the 2020 mix. Maybe 2021 onwards, I guess...
[Note to self; double-check to see if bacterial pneumonia cases mysteriously collapsed.]
Indeed. Once I get clarification either way, I plan to include this nugget to expand the analysis:
"During September 28, 2020–May 22, 2021 in the United States, 1,675 (0.2%) of 818,939 respiratory specimens tested by U.S. clinical laboratories were positive for an influenza virus"
Obviously it wouldn't be responsible for the peaks and troughs at 0.2%, meaning we're mainly looking at C19 versus bacterial pneumonia. And interestingly... I cannot seem to find any data post-2019 for bacterial pneumonia (cases or deaths). I've asked some more skilled data researchers if they're able to dig into bacterial pneumonia cases/deaths because if they've gone missing too, well...
I have referred this to Jessica for comment, and I will attempt to double-check.
As the chart says ""NCHS pneumonia deaths", I was under the view it was just pneumonia, rather than PIC. If it isn't, I will make the corrections to my remarks necessary, although not much adjustment should be needed because I don't claim all pneumonia deaths are bacterial (my assumption is pneumonia already includes all types of respiratory infections, including viral ones).
I think your objection is that she says pneumonia and COVID-19 parallel (to me the claim they parallel is a sort of 'same difference' as C19 would get classified with pneumonia by default). I'm using it here to demonstrate that pneumonia and COVID-19 both spiked in a period where both antibacterials and antivirals declined, which is odd.
Still, if I can verify the PIC thing, it won't take me two seconds to add a clarification to the image caption.
I do have a question though, if the pneumonia group (red line) includes COVID-19, why is the red line less than the C19 group (blue line)? Surely it would be additive (I.E. red line greater than blue line)?
It's a simple mistake which i have made myself. To check I downloaded the data from the CDC flu system and it is clearly PIC. I am sure Jessica can verify. I have discussed it with her but of course you should double check with her yourself.
As all CDC wonder database queries are custom generated, I don't know the specific parameters Jessica Rose put, so it wouldn't be possible for me to independently verify by myself without knowing the search parameters. As Jessica Rose is a mathematician and molecular biologist, there is an element of trust I did put in the datasets.
It is my (perhaps mistaken?) belief the graph is custom generated (CDC wonder only supplies raw data, I believe?), so it would depend on what datasets Jessica Rose opted to use, as well as any transformations to raw data that may have been applied (such as subtractions).
Obviously I cannot mount a for-or-against on her behalf, but I have forwarded a DM encouraging a reply. I've pinned your comment in the interim, however you'll understand as I'm caught between two respective field experts and I am currently unable to independently verify, I will avoid making adjustments to the article in the interim whilst the matter is addressed.
"I have discussed it with her"
Would you be willing/able to share a reference/link/screenshot of that discussion? If she has confirmed it elsewhere and I am able to see that, I'd be happy to issue an update.
i only plotted pneumonia. not influenza (aka P[I]C). in any case, even if i had plotted PIC, it wouldn't impact the pattern match to covid-19 deaths since there are very few recorded flu deaths. i have that graph if need be. :)
no it's not. it's pneumonia versus covid. :) i plotted pneumonia + flu together against covid and it's purdy much the same plot because there are very few recorded flu deaths.
just to be clear, i am not defining the type of pneumonia in my article. according to MN death cert data, there are many types. i simply plotted CDC pneumonia death data against OWID covid-19 death data. the resulting superimposed data according to date matching is uncanny. this is why i made the assumption that covid-19 deaths were actually pneumonia deaths. having said that, again, there is a lot skullduggery when it comes to defining even a pneumonia death! that's why i called the article: what is a covid-19 death. :)
This is very simple to pull off when you have large oversight organizations such as the CDC, NHS, etc. that produce an algorithm that doctors follow as “best practice” and “gold standard” treatments. Those who trust the system will blindly follow these algorithms for treatment thinking they are treating patients with the best possible care, without thinking through what is occurring. Why do you think they went after all the doctors so hard who were not following these guidelines? They were labeled with all sorts of slanderous labels such as “science deniers” or “Covid deniers” etc. and made out to be grifters and conspiracy theorists. So the treatments that would actually help patients are disregarded as “bad science.” All the while the mass majority of well-intentioned is making everything worse by doing what they naively believe to be helping or at the very least what they consider the best option because “this is a novel virus that we don’t really know how to treat right now.” The whole intubation efforts were also nefariously mass implemented to help “preserve PPE.” It was a vicious cycle that I don’t think many have learned from. But it’s what results when you have these government organizations that dictate the so-called “best care” and they withhold funding to hospitals that don’t follow these guidelines and have appropriate documentation that they are following them. Doctors spend more time asking their phones and computers for ideas on treatments and they are taught to think in terms of treatment guidelines for patients instead of actually thinking through the physiological and pathophysiological processes.
That is a good article that covers Midazolam in Italy (and Germany?), which I must admit due to my linguistic limits, I wasn't able to give much coverage to non-English speaking countries.
Last week a friend, not feeling well with an sinus infection went to her HCP and asked for an antibiotics prescription. It was denied; the HCP refused to write a prescription. After reading this article the why makes sense.
BTW, there are many natural antibiotics. Oil of oregano, rosemary, and thyme are examples. Let food be thy medicine and don't depend on better living through chemistry. Quite a bit of research on natural antibiotics can be found here: www.greenmedinfo.com. The founder, Sayer Ji, is on the USG list of top misinformation spreaders, so you can definitely trust what he publishes.
GSE grapefruit seed extract is also one and many uses there is books you can buy on it saying dosage etc lots of info. NutriBiotic or Citricidal by Higher Nature.
If you take a look at the contraindications of natural foods many chemical meds, then you can almost rest assured that these foods have the medicinal qualities to perform the function of the chemical drugs. Take blood pressure medicine as an example. Why would the insert say not to eat grapefruit or drink grapefruit juice? That's because it helps lower BP and the med dosage could either be lowered or eliminated with appropriate lifestyle and dietary changes. Dr.s don't want people to know that, because they can't make money selling grapefruit or other supplements or foods.
I completely forgot about the garlic. I have honey fermented garlic in my fridge. It's like candy. I'll bring some to my friend tomorrow. Today, I gave her some oregano oil and white willow bark to take every four hours, and my friend's feeling better already.
“Here we demonstrate that antidepressants, one of the most frequently prescribed drugs, can induce antibiotic resistance and persistence…
Here, we demonstrate that antidepressants at clinically relevant concentrations induce resistance to multiple antibiotics, even following short periods of exposure. Antibiotic persistence was also enhanced.
…..
Collectively, our studies implicate antidepressants as a contributing driver of increasing antibiotic resistance.”
Antidepressants can induce mutation and enhance persistence toward multiple antibiotics
Is SARS-CoV-2 a virus? If yes, where does it replicate?
Only in the laboratory eukaryotic cell or also in bacterial cells?
Are the bacteria in the microbiome more numerous than our cells? YES!
And does it seem normal to you that a virus passes through the microbiome layer without bacteria interacting with the virus or producing different substances than usual?
.
And these bacteria controls we performed and demonstrated
🔷 SARS-CoV-2 replicates first in bacteria
🔷 That orofecal transmission is most important precisely because of the bacterial involvement
🔷 That the bacteria produces toxins
🔷 That antibiotics or a combination of antibiotics can stop both replication, transmission, and toxin production and the clinical picture of patients especially in the early stages of the disease.
I discovered early on when this whole fake plandemic started in March of 2020, this was another well planned and staged Psy-Op's masterminded yet again by the grand masters of global genocides. The Holocaust criers themselves. Chabad Lubovitch and Talmudic rabbis who have sold their souls to the Illuminati fallen angels and the Freemasonic cult of Satanism.
Great article. Unfortunately, Jessica's pneumonia chart isn't pneumonia versus covid, rather it is PIC (pneumonia, influenza and covid) versus covid. Hence the fantastic but misleading correspondence.
Forgive me, the Substack layout had changed and I pinned the wrong comment. Normally the triple dots menu is in the top right of a comment, but to pin yours, I had to click on the... bottom right? So when I tried to use the top right, I pinned the comment above yours, rather than yours specifically as I had intended.
Apologies for the error!
In-fact, forgive my rambling, but wouldn't the pneumonia group "exclude" influenza in 2020 if we go by the 'official' narrative?
Remember, flu cases dropped to zero (supposedly, if we trust the 'official' numbers; personally I don't but what competing figures can I source?), so it wouldn't be possible for influenza to be part of the 2020 mix. Maybe 2021 onwards, I guess...
[Note to self; double-check to see if bacterial pneumonia cases mysteriously collapsed.]
It includes it. You are right there isn't a lot but there is still some.
Hi Martin, I found something disturbing I'd like to run by you.
Do you have an email address or some means of private contact so I can run the data by you and get your opinion on it?
DM me on twitter and I will share my email.
Twitter reports "@MartinNeil9 cannot be messaged" in DM.
Do I have the right account? I am able to DM Norman Fenton if he's okay with it.
I thought I was following you and you were following me! Can you tweet at me....
Indeed. Once I get clarification either way, I plan to include this nugget to expand the analysis:
"During September 28, 2020–May 22, 2021 in the United States, 1,675 (0.2%) of 818,939 respiratory specimens tested by U.S. clinical laboratories were positive for an influenza virus"
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/season/faq-flu-season-2020-2021.htm
Obviously it wouldn't be responsible for the peaks and troughs at 0.2%, meaning we're mainly looking at C19 versus bacterial pneumonia. And interestingly... I cannot seem to find any data post-2019 for bacterial pneumonia (cases or deaths). I've asked some more skilled data researchers if they're able to dig into bacterial pneumonia cases/deaths because if they've gone missing too, well...
I have referred this to Jessica for comment, and I will attempt to double-check.
As the chart says ""NCHS pneumonia deaths", I was under the view it was just pneumonia, rather than PIC. If it isn't, I will make the corrections to my remarks necessary, although not much adjustment should be needed because I don't claim all pneumonia deaths are bacterial (my assumption is pneumonia already includes all types of respiratory infections, including viral ones).
I think your objection is that she says pneumonia and COVID-19 parallel (to me the claim they parallel is a sort of 'same difference' as C19 would get classified with pneumonia by default). I'm using it here to demonstrate that pneumonia and COVID-19 both spiked in a period where both antibacterials and antivirals declined, which is odd.
Still, if I can verify the PIC thing, it won't take me two seconds to add a clarification to the image caption.
I do have a question though, if the pneumonia group (red line) includes COVID-19, why is the red line less than the C19 group (blue line)? Surely it would be additive (I.E. red line greater than blue line)?
It's a simple mistake which i have made myself. To check I downloaded the data from the CDC flu system and it is clearly PIC. I am sure Jessica can verify. I have discussed it with her but of course you should double check with her yourself.
As all CDC wonder database queries are custom generated, I don't know the specific parameters Jessica Rose put, so it wouldn't be possible for me to independently verify by myself without knowing the search parameters. As Jessica Rose is a mathematician and molecular biologist, there is an element of trust I did put in the datasets.
It is my (perhaps mistaken?) belief the graph is custom generated (CDC wonder only supplies raw data, I believe?), so it would depend on what datasets Jessica Rose opted to use, as well as any transformations to raw data that may have been applied (such as subtractions).
Obviously I cannot mount a for-or-against on her behalf, but I have forwarded a DM encouraging a reply. I've pinned your comment in the interim, however you'll understand as I'm caught between two respective field experts and I am currently unable to independently verify, I will avoid making adjustments to the article in the interim whilst the matter is addressed.
"I have discussed it with her"
Would you be willing/able to share a reference/link/screenshot of that discussion? If she has confirmed it elsewhere and I am able to see that, I'd be happy to issue an update.
i only plotted pneumonia. not influenza (aka P[I]C). in any case, even if i had plotted PIC, it wouldn't impact the pattern match to covid-19 deaths since there are very few recorded flu deaths. i have that graph if need be. :)
no it's not. it's pneumonia versus covid. :) i plotted pneumonia + flu together against covid and it's purdy much the same plot because there are very few recorded flu deaths.
just to be clear, i am not defining the type of pneumonia in my article. according to MN death cert data, there are many types. i simply plotted CDC pneumonia death data against OWID covid-19 death data. the resulting superimposed data according to date matching is uncanny. this is why i made the assumption that covid-19 deaths were actually pneumonia deaths. having said that, again, there is a lot skullduggery when it comes to defining even a pneumonia death! that's why i called the article: what is a covid-19 death. :)
If you write your response as standalone I'll be able to pin it at the top of the comments as well so it is equally as visible.
all good. tis what comments are for! :D
More proof of genocide. Thank you for your hard work.
I cannot take credit, others have done a lot of research as well.
clearly malicious
This is very simple to pull off when you have large oversight organizations such as the CDC, NHS, etc. that produce an algorithm that doctors follow as “best practice” and “gold standard” treatments. Those who trust the system will blindly follow these algorithms for treatment thinking they are treating patients with the best possible care, without thinking through what is occurring. Why do you think they went after all the doctors so hard who were not following these guidelines? They were labeled with all sorts of slanderous labels such as “science deniers” or “Covid deniers” etc. and made out to be grifters and conspiracy theorists. So the treatments that would actually help patients are disregarded as “bad science.” All the while the mass majority of well-intentioned is making everything worse by doing what they naively believe to be helping or at the very least what they consider the best option because “this is a novel virus that we don’t really know how to treat right now.” The whole intubation efforts were also nefariously mass implemented to help “preserve PPE.” It was a vicious cycle that I don’t think many have learned from. But it’s what results when you have these government organizations that dictate the so-called “best care” and they withhold funding to hospitals that don’t follow these guidelines and have appropriate documentation that they are following them. Doctors spend more time asking their phones and computers for ideas on treatments and they are taught to think in terms of treatment guidelines for patients instead of actually thinking through the physiological and pathophysiological processes.
#3Tablets and how many wouldn’t have needlessly died
https://helendunkel.substack.com/p/who-benefited-from-10000-doses-of here is more on some of the aspects of iatrogenic murder in Germany. Thank you! This is very important and helpful. If we clarify the real causes of deaths, the whole cardhouse falls apart.
That is a good article that covers Midazolam in Italy (and Germany?), which I must admit due to my linguistic limits, I wasn't able to give much coverage to non-English speaking countries.
yes it is germany but this interview with the Braun Company was published on Brauns website in GB.
Ah, forgive my confusion.
Either way Helen, you're doing excellent research, keep up the good work!
thank you. You too!
There was no pandemic!
How about a pandemic of tyranny?
Nah! They have no Laws! How can there be a tyranny when they have no Laws? However there can be tyranny when Joe Public is ignorant!
A MANDATE Is Just Another Attempt At An Adhesion Contract!- MANDATES are not LAWS!:
https://archive.org/details/a-mandate-is-just-another-attempt-at-an-adhesion-contract
Last week a friend, not feeling well with an sinus infection went to her HCP and asked for an antibiotics prescription. It was denied; the HCP refused to write a prescription. After reading this article the why makes sense.
BTW, there are many natural antibiotics. Oil of oregano, rosemary, and thyme are examples. Let food be thy medicine and don't depend on better living through chemistry. Quite a bit of research on natural antibiotics can be found here: www.greenmedinfo.com. The founder, Sayer Ji, is on the USG list of top misinformation spreaders, so you can definitely trust what he publishes.
GSE grapefruit seed extract is also one and many uses there is books you can buy on it saying dosage etc lots of info. NutriBiotic or Citricidal by Higher Nature.
If you take a look at the contraindications of natural foods many chemical meds, then you can almost rest assured that these foods have the medicinal qualities to perform the function of the chemical drugs. Take blood pressure medicine as an example. Why would the insert say not to eat grapefruit or drink grapefruit juice? That's because it helps lower BP and the med dosage could either be lowered or eliminated with appropriate lifestyle and dietary changes. Dr.s don't want people to know that, because they can't make money selling grapefruit or other supplements or foods.
Literally just eat raw garlic next time you have a sinus infection. Deal with the social stigma and get better.
I completely forgot about the garlic. I have honey fermented garlic in my fridge. It's like candy. I'll bring some to my friend tomorrow. Today, I gave her some oregano oil and white willow bark to take every four hours, and my friend's feeling better already.
ANTIDEPRESSANTS
Dr Thomas NΞNNINGΞR
https://vxtwitter.com/t_nenninger/status/1622246124261105664
Interesting.
“Here we demonstrate that antidepressants, one of the most frequently prescribed drugs, can induce antibiotic resistance and persistence…
Here, we demonstrate that antidepressants at clinically relevant concentrations induce resistance to multiple antibiotics, even following short periods of exposure. Antibiotic persistence was also enhanced.
…..
Collectively, our studies implicate antidepressants as a contributing driver of increasing antibiotic resistance.”
Antidepressants can induce mutation and enhance persistence toward multiple antibiotics
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2208344120
Is SARS-CoV-2 a virus? If yes, where does it replicate?
Only in the laboratory eukaryotic cell or also in bacterial cells?
Are the bacteria in the microbiome more numerous than our cells? YES!
And does it seem normal to you that a virus passes through the microbiome layer without bacteria interacting with the virus or producing different substances than usual?
.
And these bacteria controls we performed and demonstrated
🔷 SARS-CoV-2 replicates first in bacteria
🔷 That orofecal transmission is most important precisely because of the bacterial involvement
🔷 That the bacteria produces toxins
🔷 That antibiotics or a combination of antibiotics can stop both replication, transmission, and toxin production and the clinical picture of patients especially in the early stages of the disease.
🔷 That the intermediate host is bacteria.
🔷 That mutations are numerous in bacteria
.
51 MINS CARLO BROGNA
DR PHILIP MC MILLAN SUBSTACK.
https://philipmcmillan.substack.com/p/day-2-full-congress-and-presentation
I discovered early on when this whole fake plandemic started in March of 2020, this was another well planned and staged Psy-Op's masterminded yet again by the grand masters of global genocides. The Holocaust criers themselves. Chabad Lubovitch and Talmudic rabbis who have sold their souls to the Illuminati fallen angels and the Freemasonic cult of Satanism.
Prominent Jewish Rabbi Exposes Truth About Adolf Hitler, Jews, Communism/Bolshevism https://www.bitchute.com/video/F9wiYay3Lzki/