Can I call this another "shocked" moment? They're not even trying to hide the lies. The Lugenpresse will run with the hot take and pretty graphics. The Lie gets aired before anyone even gets into the datasets. Anyone who challenges the now-established Narrative is spreading misinformation and must be silenced. Nice positive feedback cycle they have there.
I think they probably just forgot to change the months to start from April instead of Jan. Yeah, it's incredible that they are using written word months and not numerical values but I think it's as simple as that on this one. I don't know why they started from April this time round but perhaps they listened to us and knew that they couldn't make any VE claims prior to then because no-one was "fully protected"? Or, perhaps because a load of the deaths they "found" made those early few months much worse than they had previously claimed and they didn't want to have to announce the correction? easier just to leave it out this time round and hope no-one notices? Apart from hundreds of data sleuths of course!
Either way, their fudging attempts, as you say, are getting spotted by numerous sleuths.
Professor Fenton has even more analysis and this is probably their worst batch of data yet. No longer do any of their classic tricks work, they're now deleting, fudging, changing numbers, anything out of desperation to make figures for vaccines look good.
The government has sold out to the pharmaceutical industry, and this fraudulent dataset (along with all the others) proves it.
Can I call this another "shocked" moment? They're not even trying to hide the lies. The Lugenpresse will run with the hot take and pretty graphics. The Lie gets aired before anyone even gets into the datasets. Anyone who challenges the now-established Narrative is spreading misinformation and must be silenced. Nice positive feedback cycle they have there.
I think they probably just forgot to change the months to start from April instead of Jan. Yeah, it's incredible that they are using written word months and not numerical values but I think it's as simple as that on this one. I don't know why they started from April this time round but perhaps they listened to us and knew that they couldn't make any VE claims prior to then because no-one was "fully protected"? Or, perhaps because a load of the deaths they "found" made those early few months much worse than they had previously claimed and they didn't want to have to announce the correction? easier just to leave it out this time round and hope no-one notices? Apart from hundreds of data sleuths of course!
Either way, their fudging attempts, as you say, are getting spotted by numerous sleuths.
Professor Fenton has even more analysis and this is probably their worst batch of data yet. No longer do any of their classic tricks work, they're now deleting, fudging, changing numbers, anything out of desperation to make figures for vaccines look good.
The government has sold out to the pharmaceutical industry, and this fraudulent dataset (along with all the others) proves it.
"I think they probably just forgot to change the months to start from April instead of Jan."
That point was rebutted in the article, because the dataset clearly begins in January.
https://jdee.substack.com/p/ons-vaccination-deaths-analysis
Here’s a good analysis. Says he’s doing further analysis this afternoon with age stratification I think.