He claims the spike protein is a non factor, and the injury is a result of the injection itself creating a clump of LNP's that injure the lining of the vascular system (leading to clots, strokes, aneurysms, heart attacks etc). These injuries are repeated across all vaccines types, the only difference with C19 being the largely quantity and high temporal concentration of vaxxes making the injuries more noticeable to all.
I am a simple layman but find his hypothesis very plausible.
The spike protein is definitely a factor (the mRNA instability issue was hidden even more so than the LNPs), but it's an extremely complex subject that cannot be broached in a single article, nor a single theory, as there are many intra-dependent parts. These two articles by The Daily Beagle have covered a lot of ground, and yet so far we have:
'LNPs collect in the liver'
'Liver triggers clotting'
'LNPs last an unnaturally long time'
Two in-depth articles picking apart complex terminology just to prove three simple-to-say things!
LNPs have a plot twist and don't operate solo, however I have to establish the individual pieces of the mechanism before people will realise how bad this all gets. mRNA definitely plays a role, but how comes later on in the discovery chain.
As for the aspiration model, John Campbell proposed it a while back. There's a number of holes with it:
First, there's no correlating trend line with aspiration/non-aspiration and adverse outcomes. If you dig through VAERS you will find many declarations of aspiration used with shots resulting in devastating outcomes.
Second, cardiovascular specialists - those who are intimately familiar with the blood vessels - will eagerly point out for the muscles to be sustained (regarding injections 'intramuscular' - into the muscles) there has to be a large network of blood vessels within said muscles. They might be small, but there's no part of the muscle that isn't connected to a blood vessel in some way. So the release will occur into the bloodstream regardless of where it is injected. In my non-expert opinion the only difference is how long it takes for the adverse effect to emerge.
Third, aspiration, even if it was a factor, does not change the fact Pfizer & Co sell poison shots. This was an indirect position quietly and indirectly suggested by Campbell as well, after he admitted there shouldn't be a scenario where it is toxic in the bloodstream but not toxic in the muscles ('it doesn't make much sense').
To me, the aspiration theory seems like something some pharmaceutical manager threw out in order to deflect blame from the fundamental flaw of their own shots. I don't personally buy it, and aspiration hasn't been a major risk factor previously.
For the record, the LNPs ended up in the liver regardless of site of injection according to the Pfizer animal studies - which are intramuscular. So either:
A) They did aspiration correctly and it is irrelevant to liver toxicity or
B) They committed fraud on their trial study and lied about intramuscular injection
Either way, no escape for pharmaceutical frauds. Blaming the worker goons isn't going to solve it.
Thank you for your detailed response. I must admit some of the technicalities are beyond my comprehension at this point. I believe he has addressed your questions and points in various degrees on his stack.
We can propose competing theories, but very, very few have discussed the EMA leak documents, and even fewer have accepted access to it.
Besides the BMJ (who mainly just verified the documents), Jessica Rose is the only other person to have seriously considered the consequences of the unstable mRNA. The irony is, the other deadly aspects of the shots (namely, LNPs damaging the liver triggering clot events) are preventing people from seeing what the ungodly consequences of the unstable mRNA are.
Can't exactly pass genetic defects triggered by shots to children if you don't even live long enough to have them.
I genuinely feel I've managed to uncover a major piece of the puzzle, but I do not feel it is an exclusive nor complete answer, and Hickam's dictum tells us in medicine we should avoid looking for a simplified explanation as often people with illnesses have multiple causes and conditions.
I do not feel it answers the myocarditis or pericarditis events, for example, but it does answer the DVT and sinus thrombosis events.
I think there might be a dual-purpose event occurring where the fibrinogen interacts with thromocyte production and interacts with the spike proteins in some way. So the liver overproduces thromocytes, then the spike proteins cause them to clump together in some fashion somehow.
Now, although the animal studies suggest LNP leakage reaching the liver, another question to ask is would mRNA inserts also cause damage to the liver?
I'm intending to explore more beyond this discovery, however being such a complex subject I do not anticipate to find any answers soon, and I would need to find a liver specialist willing to discuss with me on the hypotheticals of what is occurring.
Whilst they're all good candidates, I would need to speak with either a Gastroenterologist (who more generally deals with digestive health issues, including the liver), or more crucially, a Hepatologist (liver specialist) who would be able to verify the mechanistic findings.
I have included your links at the bottom of the article. Whilst you're here, I have a favour to ask, would it be possible for you to put me in touch with an academic who is knowledgeable with how LNPs work? Specifically in relation to the purpose cholesterol serves in LNP mechanisms.
I need to ask a handful of questions for my own understanding, as I believe I've spotted something that could have profound implications in the vaccine debate, but I need to be absolutely sure I understand it correctly.
Oh, and the graph you reposted the other day, I don't know if you saw my Tweet but I was the one who drew it. ; )
Are the fibrins generated unique to the jabs making the body's natural clot dissolving enzymes ineffective? (Do the jabs produce an unnatural/artificial fibrin the body can't dissolve?)
Are the fibrins being generated in such large quantities, the body is overwhelmed?
Or is it a combination of unable to be dissolved and amount of fibrin generated?
So the fibrin generation is unique to the jabs as it is the LNPs found in the shots that cause the liver cells to produce fibrinogen.
My theory is quantity is determined by amount of free-floating LNPs in the body: which can be translated as: how many shots you take in a given space of time.
Assuming LNPs are not permanent (although because it is novel I don't know what truly happens, so they could be permanent?), they would reduce over time. If someone gets a set of shots bunched together, the more LNPs in a shorter space of time, the higher probability of risk.
Moderna shots report higher adverse event rates than Pfizer, and when I queried, it turns out Moderna have more LNPs in a single dose than Pfizer. That said, only Pfizer are really going for the 'booster shot' campaign, so even if they may have somewhat lower quantities, they're reoccurring at a continuous frequency (assuming someone naively follows the scheduling).
I would also say there's co-factors, like obesity and the size of the body; the smaller the body relative to the amount of LNPs, the higher the probability. Interestingly, we do see children more affected by myocarditis, and women more impacted by blood clots.
There's other factors as well. So reportedly spike proteins can coagulate (clot) with platelets (clotting cells), and I have seen one report - not verified - that spike proteins can coagulate with each other. So there's also a spike protein quantity dimension as well.
I wouldn't be able to hazard what the thresholds or amounts are, but with a plausible mechanism on the table it can now be investigated.
In regards to the LNP coating, Dr. Arne Burkhardt was/is finding crystallized cholesterol in pathological exams in several organs and tissues that were given to him. His group feels the crystallized cholesterol is residue from the LNP coating. He also gives his thoughts on amyloidosis to explain the fibrous masses.
Not sure if you've seen this already since it came out in September 2022, but discussion of crystalline cholesterol starts around 12:00. The sound is in German, but it has English subtitles.
Also forgot to mention they THINK the crystallizations act as little razors which would also promote fibrogenesis because their sharp edges damage tissue at a microscopic level. When you mentioned LNP, I immediately remembered these videos I saw awhile back.
My 37 y.o. nephew, heavily vaccinated and from a family of physicians/medical personnel, had a liver transplant in late December. Heartbreaking. Thank you for your research/writings.
There are several OCR software programs that can convert most postscript files to searchable form, make editable documents from them and extract tables to spreadsheet formats, they are better than Adobe and less expensive.
I used Abbyy for years to do this. They do not work on protected files but if you can print it then you can re-scan it, however you may loose some character that must be repaired by hand.
The best software to read protected files was Ghostscript and Ghostview. I do not know if the new versions can perform this function as well as the old versions. Another trick I have used was to print (select from printer window) the pdf to Microsoft XPS document writer then perform OCR from that. All this is based on using Microsoft Windows computer. I do not know if Apple gives you this functionality.
Have used these techniques for over 10 years to extract data for research purposes. Whatever it takes!
I already converted the Fauci FOIA documents to an OCR read format using a localised OCR tool, which is what the article details, which allowed me to optimise the reading efficiency. You can find the searchable text file here:
Adobe is primarily Windows-only. Ghostscript is proprietary and hasn't been updated in a while. I use Linux for efficiency on my old laptop. It took 4 days but it got the job done.
I've worked in Big Data previously doing data conversion, so most of this is up my street, but when it comes to medical data files, nothing beats manual human review. Automated tools can only do so much.
The whole process Big Pharma seem to have adopted since 2019 (Covid & onwards) is carefree, casual with absolutely no regard for consequences, human injuries or/and deaths. The (lack of) Quality Control in manufacture and distribution, storage, Safety, Efficacy , even in the variations within their supposed 'controlled' formulae. Big Pharma tried to get permission to hide it's dirty little secret formula for 75 years before 'deadly recipe' was to be revealed. Now it's a few pages every month!
These incompetent attitudes abound throughout Big Pharma and have suddenly become far more serious and LETHAL since the advent of their 'Covid Vax' Bonanza - windfall!
This is partially due to the vast volume of illicit business they've conned our incompetent and gullible Governments to buy into The DEADLY farce has mainly been caused by complacency that has increased spectacularly since Big Pharma enjoy NO CONSEQUENCES for anything that might occur after the crap leaves the factory gates.
Why would anyone accept an 'EXPERIMENTAL INJECTION', created in a few weeks (months) after the disease, it was supposed to halt, (? was deliberately introduced after DEADLY G.O.F modification by Fauci,). The useless but DEADLY 'Cure' was concocted, in suspiciously 'double quick time', by companies that enjoy NO LIABILITY for Adverse Reactions or DEATHS that follow the use of their crap!?
It's insane! But your Government (and mine) 'sold' it to us on the "SAFE & EFFECTIVE" lie! Now thousands (if not millions) are paying the consequences of believing!
'TERRORIST' seems to be the favourite word for anyone that dares to question the WEF (NWO) agenda, which includes implanting McCarthy and other gimps into 'high office' in order to dominate world politics = to remove 'FREEDOM'. McCarthy has attended WEF Davos TWICE!
DEADLY POISON INJECTIONS, called VACCINES, must again carry the responsibility of 'LIABILITY' for the manufacturers! Then Covid will fade into obscurity and Pfizer et al, will be BANKRUPTED! Common sense!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed and enjoying Freedom of expression!
Underdog, I invite you to check out an interesting theory on the mechanism of the vaxx injuries at this stack: https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/the-cytotoxic-bolus-theory-on-the
He claims the spike protein is a non factor, and the injury is a result of the injection itself creating a clump of LNP's that injure the lining of the vascular system (leading to clots, strokes, aneurysms, heart attacks etc). These injuries are repeated across all vaccines types, the only difference with C19 being the largely quantity and high temporal concentration of vaxxes making the injuries more noticeable to all.
I am a simple layman but find his hypothesis very plausible.
The spike protein is definitely a factor (the mRNA instability issue was hidden even more so than the LNPs), but it's an extremely complex subject that cannot be broached in a single article, nor a single theory, as there are many intra-dependent parts. These two articles by The Daily Beagle have covered a lot of ground, and yet so far we have:
'LNPs collect in the liver'
'Liver triggers clotting'
'LNPs last an unnaturally long time'
Two in-depth articles picking apart complex terminology just to prove three simple-to-say things!
LNPs have a plot twist and don't operate solo, however I have to establish the individual pieces of the mechanism before people will realise how bad this all gets. mRNA definitely plays a role, but how comes later on in the discovery chain.
As for the aspiration model, John Campbell proposed it a while back. There's a number of holes with it:
First, there's no correlating trend line with aspiration/non-aspiration and adverse outcomes. If you dig through VAERS you will find many declarations of aspiration used with shots resulting in devastating outcomes.
Second, cardiovascular specialists - those who are intimately familiar with the blood vessels - will eagerly point out for the muscles to be sustained (regarding injections 'intramuscular' - into the muscles) there has to be a large network of blood vessels within said muscles. They might be small, but there's no part of the muscle that isn't connected to a blood vessel in some way. So the release will occur into the bloodstream regardless of where it is injected. In my non-expert opinion the only difference is how long it takes for the adverse effect to emerge.
Third, aspiration, even if it was a factor, does not change the fact Pfizer & Co sell poison shots. This was an indirect position quietly and indirectly suggested by Campbell as well, after he admitted there shouldn't be a scenario where it is toxic in the bloodstream but not toxic in the muscles ('it doesn't make much sense').
To me, the aspiration theory seems like something some pharmaceutical manager threw out in order to deflect blame from the fundamental flaw of their own shots. I don't personally buy it, and aspiration hasn't been a major risk factor previously.
For the record, the LNPs ended up in the liver regardless of site of injection according to the Pfizer animal studies - which are intramuscular. So either:
A) They did aspiration correctly and it is irrelevant to liver toxicity or
B) They committed fraud on their trial study and lied about intramuscular injection
Either way, no escape for pharmaceutical frauds. Blaming the worker goons isn't going to solve it.
Thank you for your detailed response. I must admit some of the technicalities are beyond my comprehension at this point. I believe he has addressed your questions and points in various degrees on his stack.
What IS within my abilities is to intuit that both of yourself and Girardot are intelligent, educated and most importantly honest. His theories have been positively embraced by Weinstein, Crawford (https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/covid-myth-buster-meets-rounding) and others.
And so in the interest of seeking truth I would encourage you to tkae a deeper look.
We can propose competing theories, but very, very few have discussed the EMA leak documents, and even fewer have accepted access to it.
Besides the BMJ (who mainly just verified the documents), Jessica Rose is the only other person to have seriously considered the consequences of the unstable mRNA. The irony is, the other deadly aspects of the shots (namely, LNPs damaging the liver triggering clot events) are preventing people from seeing what the ungodly consequences of the unstable mRNA are.
Can't exactly pass genetic defects triggered by shots to children if you don't even live long enough to have them.
Your idea makes more sense than most of the clotting schemes that I have seen presented.
I assume that you have also read about these proposed mechanisms:
https://open.substack.com/pub/amidwesterndoctor/p/how-do-vaccines-cause-sudden-death?
Search down the post for the section “Why Do the Spike Protein Vaccines Cause Blood Clotting?”
Also:
https://open.substack.com/pub/amidwesterndoctor/p/what-is-causing-the-died-suddenly?
AMD regularly responds to comments. I will post your article there. He will likely be interested in your research.
I genuinely feel I've managed to uncover a major piece of the puzzle, but I do not feel it is an exclusive nor complete answer, and Hickam's dictum tells us in medicine we should avoid looking for a simplified explanation as often people with illnesses have multiple causes and conditions.
I do not feel it answers the myocarditis or pericarditis events, for example, but it does answer the DVT and sinus thrombosis events.
I think there might be a dual-purpose event occurring where the fibrinogen interacts with thromocyte production and interacts with the spike proteins in some way. So the liver overproduces thromocytes, then the spike proteins cause them to clump together in some fashion somehow.
Now, although the animal studies suggest LNP leakage reaching the liver, another question to ask is would mRNA inserts also cause damage to the liver?
I'm intending to explore more beyond this discovery, however being such a complex subject I do not anticipate to find any answers soon, and I would need to find a liver specialist willing to discuss with me on the hypotheticals of what is occurring.
Well done for all your rigorous and intense study, Underdog!
We need to get you linked up with Jessica Rose and Byram Bridle etc on this. Bret Weinstein? Aseem Malhotra?
Whilst they're all good candidates, I would need to speak with either a Gastroenterologist (who more generally deals with digestive health issues, including the liver), or more crucially, a Hepatologist (liver specialist) who would be able to verify the mechanistic findings.
👍
Awesome. And share this: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/spike-s1-heparin-and-the-coagulation and this: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/is-sars-ncov-2-associated-systemic
I have included your links at the bottom of the article. Whilst you're here, I have a favour to ask, would it be possible for you to put me in touch with an academic who is knowledgeable with how LNPs work? Specifically in relation to the purpose cholesterol serves in LNP mechanisms.
I need to ask a handful of questions for my own understanding, as I believe I've spotted something that could have profound implications in the vaccine debate, but I need to be absolutely sure I understand it correctly.
Oh, and the graph you reposted the other day, I don't know if you saw my Tweet but I was the one who drew it. ; )
Great post that I'm just now seeing.
Are the fibrins generated unique to the jabs making the body's natural clot dissolving enzymes ineffective? (Do the jabs produce an unnatural/artificial fibrin the body can't dissolve?)
Are the fibrins being generated in such large quantities, the body is overwhelmed?
Or is it a combination of unable to be dissolved and amount of fibrin generated?
Either way, it's pretty messed up.
So the fibrin generation is unique to the jabs as it is the LNPs found in the shots that cause the liver cells to produce fibrinogen.
My theory is quantity is determined by amount of free-floating LNPs in the body: which can be translated as: how many shots you take in a given space of time.
Assuming LNPs are not permanent (although because it is novel I don't know what truly happens, so they could be permanent?), they would reduce over time. If someone gets a set of shots bunched together, the more LNPs in a shorter space of time, the higher probability of risk.
Moderna shots report higher adverse event rates than Pfizer, and when I queried, it turns out Moderna have more LNPs in a single dose than Pfizer. That said, only Pfizer are really going for the 'booster shot' campaign, so even if they may have somewhat lower quantities, they're reoccurring at a continuous frequency (assuming someone naively follows the scheduling).
I would also say there's co-factors, like obesity and the size of the body; the smaller the body relative to the amount of LNPs, the higher the probability. Interestingly, we do see children more affected by myocarditis, and women more impacted by blood clots.
There's other factors as well. So reportedly spike proteins can coagulate (clot) with platelets (clotting cells), and I have seen one report - not verified - that spike proteins can coagulate with each other. So there's also a spike protein quantity dimension as well.
I wouldn't be able to hazard what the thresholds or amounts are, but with a plausible mechanism on the table it can now be investigated.
Thanks for the reply.
In regards to the LNP coating, Dr. Arne Burkhardt was/is finding crystallized cholesterol in pathological exams in several organs and tissues that were given to him. His group feels the crystallized cholesterol is residue from the LNP coating. He also gives his thoughts on amyloidosis to explain the fibrous masses.
Not sure if you've seen this already since it came out in September 2022, but discussion of crystalline cholesterol starts around 12:00. The sound is in German, but it has English subtitles.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BYhP0JobXKYq/
I was not even aware cholesterol crystalises but it is fascinating to see that is the case!
Forgot part 2/2 of Arne Burkhardt's presentation.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FXnQcnk5ZQhG/
Also forgot to mention they THINK the crystallizations act as little razors which would also promote fibrogenesis because their sharp edges damage tissue at a microscopic level. When you mentioned LNP, I immediately remembered these videos I saw awhile back.
This evil crap is multilevel.
My 37 y.o. nephew, heavily vaccinated and from a family of physicians/medical personnel, had a liver transplant in late December. Heartbreaking. Thank you for your research/writings.
Amazing work! I tweeted it for you
There are several OCR software programs that can convert most postscript files to searchable form, make editable documents from them and extract tables to spreadsheet formats, they are better than Adobe and less expensive.
See "https://www.adamenfroy.com/best-ocr-software" for a review.
I used Abbyy for years to do this. They do not work on protected files but if you can print it then you can re-scan it, however you may loose some character that must be repaired by hand.
The best software to read protected files was Ghostscript and Ghostview. I do not know if the new versions can perform this function as well as the old versions. Another trick I have used was to print (select from printer window) the pdf to Microsoft XPS document writer then perform OCR from that. All this is based on using Microsoft Windows computer. I do not know if Apple gives you this functionality.
Have used these techniques for over 10 years to extract data for research purposes. Whatever it takes!
I already converted the Fauci FOIA documents to an OCR read format using a localised OCR tool, which is what the article details, which allowed me to optimise the reading efficiency. You can find the searchable text file here:
https://gitlab.com/TheUnderdog/general-research/-/blob/main/FauciFOIAEmails/leopold-nih-foia-anthony-fauci-emails.txt
Adobe is primarily Windows-only. Ghostscript is proprietary and hasn't been updated in a while. I use Linux for efficiency on my old laptop. It took 4 days but it got the job done.
I've worked in Big Data previously doing data conversion, so most of this is up my street, but when it comes to medical data files, nothing beats manual human review. Automated tools can only do so much.
Thank you for your excellent work.
I love Linux/Unix based systems. But became stuck in the Microsoft world when MS Office was mandated by my employer.
You are clearly way ahead of me.
The whole process Big Pharma seem to have adopted since 2019 (Covid & onwards) is carefree, casual with absolutely no regard for consequences, human injuries or/and deaths. The (lack of) Quality Control in manufacture and distribution, storage, Safety, Efficacy , even in the variations within their supposed 'controlled' formulae. Big Pharma tried to get permission to hide it's dirty little secret formula for 75 years before 'deadly recipe' was to be revealed. Now it's a few pages every month!
These incompetent attitudes abound throughout Big Pharma and have suddenly become far more serious and LETHAL since the advent of their 'Covid Vax' Bonanza - windfall!
This is partially due to the vast volume of illicit business they've conned our incompetent and gullible Governments to buy into The DEADLY farce has mainly been caused by complacency that has increased spectacularly since Big Pharma enjoy NO CONSEQUENCES for anything that might occur after the crap leaves the factory gates.
Why would anyone accept an 'EXPERIMENTAL INJECTION', created in a few weeks (months) after the disease, it was supposed to halt, (? was deliberately introduced after DEADLY G.O.F modification by Fauci,). The useless but DEADLY 'Cure' was concocted, in suspiciously 'double quick time', by companies that enjoy NO LIABILITY for Adverse Reactions or DEATHS that follow the use of their crap!?
It's insane! But your Government (and mine) 'sold' it to us on the "SAFE & EFFECTIVE" lie! Now thousands (if not millions) are paying the consequences of believing!
'TERRORIST' seems to be the favourite word for anyone that dares to question the WEF (NWO) agenda, which includes implanting McCarthy and other gimps into 'high office' in order to dominate world politics = to remove 'FREEDOM'. McCarthy has attended WEF Davos TWICE!
DEADLY POISON INJECTIONS, called VACCINES, must again carry the responsibility of 'LIABILITY' for the manufacturers! Then Covid will fade into obscurity and Pfizer et al, will be BANKRUPTED! Common sense!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed and enjoying Freedom of expression!
Thank you for these important findings.
It's another indication of the unimportance of spike proteins, which was put forward by Stefano Scoglio: https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/07/that-mrna-vaccines-cause-cells-to-produce-spike-proteins-is-a-fairy-tale/
The hepatocytes manufacture more clotting factors, while they vacuolate, die off ? This needs to be squared.
When liver tissue gets damaged, it produces fibrinogen in response to said tissue damage, attempting to repair said damage.
Also I fundamentally disagree with off-guardian because the EMA leaks clearly show, in-fact, the cells *are* taught to make mRNA.
The LNPs are just one part of this giant clusterfuck that is the Pfizer poison shot.