If they have Bell's Palsy, I think it suggests they (Pfizer employees) did not take a saline.
For the record, I don't know if all Bell's Palsy is cancer caused, and my article isn't trying to suggest that, the case report cited in TDB article simply wonders if their particular patient has cancer rather than Bell's Palsy (or if the cancer might be causing their specific Bell's Palsy style case).
It could be possible, but a single speculative case wouldn't be sufficient and I wouldn't want to infer beyond what I can reference.
Sometimes I like to check in on Dr John B's telegram page; he collects all sorts of vax injury case reports (and other matters, e.g. aluminium & glyphosate toxicity) from various obscure journals I would never read:
I used to collate and double-check his reports for duplicates before adding them to my compiled list of studies showing harms (at least 960+ studies now). He's a good guy. I had to stop updating/compiling the list because new, more compelling problems keep emerging and I wasn't able to keep track of his posts.
This trend of denialism in the face of accepted on the ground trends in plain sight is nothing new. Autism goes up in step with ever increasing doses on the childhood schedule and it’s anything but the shots - you don’t dare even ask questions (feels like behaviour of old school religion, nothing scientific or medical). Autism from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 30 and approaching 1 in 20 for boys and most people (however it’s falling rapidly now thanks to covid) still blindly accept the explanation without any skepticism. Autism is the headline issue with vaccines, but it’s the same for so many illnesses when comparing vaxxed verse unvaxxed like ear infections, the unvaxxed are orders of magnitude more healthy. Just ask Petter Abby and Christine Benn, they were not expecting their finding of over 5x higher all cause mortality in African children vaccinated with DTP than those that were not.
The Pharma lobby has been so successful at getting people to accept shots that look very questionable on account that not taking them and risking being smeared as an anti-vaxxer and tinfoil hat is worse. How is it that a group that treats people that way has any credibility? Not to mention how often they have been guilty and convicted of criminal activity, yet we line up all over again and trust them on the next issue? It’s the power of the black box I guess.
The increase in cancer drug sales I actually wanted to include, but I originally saw it as a Tweet. Unfortunately I forgot to copy it down into my draft notes during browsing and Twitter does not allow you to search properly for forbidden topics, and search engines just spam you with government and corporate propaganda sites, so it got lost to the void.
It is however indirectly mentioned in Ethical Skeptic's Tweet, which has a chart showing the increase in cancer drugs sold.
So what do we citizen analysts of methodologies actually know about "cancer"?
Are we taking the word of scientists & doctors who still "believe" in viruses? Who still believe bacteria are predators & parasites instead of extremely necessary janitors who clean up dead cells & tissue?
Are we taking the word of the Mainstream Establishment Narratives?
Once you begin to critically analyze the Narrative about "cancer", you find it is extremely murky & confusing. This means the studies and their methodologies must be terribly flawed. Perhaps their foundational way of looking at "cancer" as something to wage war against is the start of all their problems. There's THAT, and then there's the failure to adequately address the causes.
Basically the only weapon in their war is symptom suppression via synthetic chemicals and/or radiation and/or surgery of some sort. There's no attempt to address the cause or use nontoxic treatments like 10 - 30 day fasts or a radical dietary change from processed foods to whole, raw foods.
But my primary reason for commenting is my concern about the tests for "cancer" and what if they are flawed or fake, and what if people get a false or fake positive, and what if they start allopathic treatments and die from the treatments but their death certificates lists "cancer" as the cause of death?
How many such "cancer" deaths were actually caused by "cancer" rather than the treatments?
I'm not disputing that something weird like cancer seems to happen in some biological bodies, nor am I doubting there's been a verifiable increase in cancer cases, but what I am thinking about harkens back to the HIV/AIDS/AZT scam that killed Freddie Mercury and Rock Hudson and Ezy-Mutherfucken-E and Arthur Ashe and no doubt thousands of others who fell for the fake HIV tests.
Fake test >> fake positive >> unnecessary toxic treatments >> death by "cancer" or "HIV" or "Covid".
If "they" have been wrong for all of these years about bacteria & "viruses", and, science-based healthcare is listed as the #3 leading cause of death when it wasn't even in the Top 10 in 1900, then just how fucken trustworthy do you think "they" are about "cancer"?
What is cancer?
Who you gonna ask?
An American allopath?
A practitioner of ancient Chinese medicine?
A homeopath?
A naturopath?
A practitioner of ancient Indian medicine?
A practitioner of ancient African medicine?
Do you think you'll get the same answers from each of those groups? The same prescribed treatments?
What if the allopaths are more wrong about cancer than right about it?
All we can do is critically scrutinize the methodologies used in "their" studies and see if they are sound & sane. I approach everything the Narrative claims to be a cause or a cure as a baldfaced lie until proven otherwise. They have proven themselves to be THAT untrustworthy.
Great philosophy, thnx for the insight!! The only way out of this is decentralization of Allopathic medicine bc their cornerstone will always be pushing 💊 for them to make 💵 which more often than not kills patients faster than the disease. I’ve found Dr Jack Kruse to be fascinating, he’s been on Rick Rubin’s Tetragrammaton podcast a number of times (the two episodes w/ Huberman last spring were phenomenal). The only way out is to end the system & start all over again, Uncle Jack is doing that now in El Salvador…And RIP Ezy-Mutherfuken-E 🩶🫶
Might also be worth revisiting
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/philadelphia-2023
Speculation that the co-creator of the Pfizer vax has Bells Palsy.
https://dailysceptic.org/2024/01/09/biontech-pfizer-vaccine-creator-obviously-suffers-from-bells-palsy-but-no-one-talks-about-it/
That would be schadenfreude.
If they have Bell's Palsy, I think it suggests they (Pfizer employees) did not take a saline.
For the record, I don't know if all Bell's Palsy is cancer caused, and my article isn't trying to suggest that, the case report cited in TDB article simply wonders if their particular patient has cancer rather than Bell's Palsy (or if the cancer might be causing their specific Bell's Palsy style case).
It could be possible, but a single speculative case wouldn't be sufficient and I wouldn't want to infer beyond what I can reference.
Sometimes I like to check in on Dr John B's telegram page; he collects all sorts of vax injury case reports (and other matters, e.g. aluminium & glyphosate toxicity) from various obscure journals I would never read:
https://t.me/s/drjohnb
I used to collate and double-check his reports for duplicates before adding them to my compiled list of studies showing harms (at least 960+ studies now). He's a good guy. I had to stop updating/compiling the list because new, more compelling problems keep emerging and I wasn't able to keep track of his posts.
This trend of denialism in the face of accepted on the ground trends in plain sight is nothing new. Autism goes up in step with ever increasing doses on the childhood schedule and it’s anything but the shots - you don’t dare even ask questions (feels like behaviour of old school religion, nothing scientific or medical). Autism from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 30 and approaching 1 in 20 for boys and most people (however it’s falling rapidly now thanks to covid) still blindly accept the explanation without any skepticism. Autism is the headline issue with vaccines, but it’s the same for so many illnesses when comparing vaxxed verse unvaxxed like ear infections, the unvaxxed are orders of magnitude more healthy. Just ask Petter Abby and Christine Benn, they were not expecting their finding of over 5x higher all cause mortality in African children vaccinated with DTP than those that were not.
The Pharma lobby has been so successful at getting people to accept shots that look very questionable on account that not taking them and risking being smeared as an anti-vaxxer and tinfoil hat is worse. How is it that a group that treats people that way has any credibility? Not to mention how often they have been guilty and convicted of criminal activity, yet we line up all over again and trust them on the next issue? It’s the power of the black box I guess.
Hopefully the tide is about to ebb.
Increase sales of cancer drugs Singapore
https://www.aussie17.com/p/bombshell-report-startling-spike?r=tz7eh&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Thank you for referencing this!
https://www.aussie17.com/p/bombshell-report-startling-spike
The increase in cancer drug sales I actually wanted to include, but I originally saw it as a Tweet. Unfortunately I forgot to copy it down into my draft notes during browsing and Twitter does not allow you to search properly for forbidden topics, and search engines just spam you with government and corporate propaganda sites, so it got lost to the void.
It is however indirectly mentioned in Ethical Skeptic's Tweet, which has a chart showing the increase in cancer drugs sold.
So what do we citizen analysts of methodologies actually know about "cancer"?
Are we taking the word of scientists & doctors who still "believe" in viruses? Who still believe bacteria are predators & parasites instead of extremely necessary janitors who clean up dead cells & tissue?
Are we taking the word of the Mainstream Establishment Narratives?
Once you begin to critically analyze the Narrative about "cancer", you find it is extremely murky & confusing. This means the studies and their methodologies must be terribly flawed. Perhaps their foundational way of looking at "cancer" as something to wage war against is the start of all their problems. There's THAT, and then there's the failure to adequately address the causes.
Basically the only weapon in their war is symptom suppression via synthetic chemicals and/or radiation and/or surgery of some sort. There's no attempt to address the cause or use nontoxic treatments like 10 - 30 day fasts or a radical dietary change from processed foods to whole, raw foods.
But my primary reason for commenting is my concern about the tests for "cancer" and what if they are flawed or fake, and what if people get a false or fake positive, and what if they start allopathic treatments and die from the treatments but their death certificates lists "cancer" as the cause of death?
How many such "cancer" deaths were actually caused by "cancer" rather than the treatments?
I'm not disputing that something weird like cancer seems to happen in some biological bodies, nor am I doubting there's been a verifiable increase in cancer cases, but what I am thinking about harkens back to the HIV/AIDS/AZT scam that killed Freddie Mercury and Rock Hudson and Ezy-Mutherfucken-E and Arthur Ashe and no doubt thousands of others who fell for the fake HIV tests.
Fake test >> fake positive >> unnecessary toxic treatments >> death by "cancer" or "HIV" or "Covid".
If "they" have been wrong for all of these years about bacteria & "viruses", and, science-based healthcare is listed as the #3 leading cause of death when it wasn't even in the Top 10 in 1900, then just how fucken trustworthy do you think "they" are about "cancer"?
What is cancer?
Who you gonna ask?
An American allopath?
A practitioner of ancient Chinese medicine?
A homeopath?
A naturopath?
A practitioner of ancient Indian medicine?
A practitioner of ancient African medicine?
Do you think you'll get the same answers from each of those groups? The same prescribed treatments?
What if the allopaths are more wrong about cancer than right about it?
All we can do is critically scrutinize the methodologies used in "their" studies and see if they are sound & sane. I approach everything the Narrative claims to be a cause or a cure as a baldfaced lie until proven otherwise. They have proven themselves to be THAT untrustworthy.
Great philosophy, thnx for the insight!! The only way out of this is decentralization of Allopathic medicine bc their cornerstone will always be pushing 💊 for them to make 💵 which more often than not kills patients faster than the disease. I’ve found Dr Jack Kruse to be fascinating, he’s been on Rick Rubin’s Tetragrammaton podcast a number of times (the two episodes w/ Huberman last spring were phenomenal). The only way out is to end the system & start all over again, Uncle Jack is doing that now in El Salvador…And RIP Ezy-Mutherfuken-E 🩶🫶