Here's a pat on the back for the Daily Beagle for airing the obscene corruption of the fashion and movie industries. After we have defeated the globalists and dealt justice to their minions and enforcers, history will acknowledge your siding with humanity. A quick knuckle, mate.
Nov 27, 2022·edited Nov 27, 2022Liked by The Underdog
Well put, especially your point that what Hollywood finds 'offensive' doesn't align with what us everyday folk find offensive!
Any ad featuring children in a sexualised context is wrong. The fact that this company focused primarily on the SCOTUS paper, ignoring the apparent entire tone of the ad, is just gross.
Fashion companies have been doing it for decades. I remember Manolo Blahnik and, I think, Calvin Klein in the 80s and 90s, with sexualised ads involving little boys in underwear. Very sad and disturbing. Sick bastards. And, of course, the staple fashion trope of abnormally-thin young women looking unhappy, drugged and even physically abused as being 'cool' and desirable. 'Heroin chic'.
Here's a pat on the back for the Daily Beagle for airing the obscene corruption of the fashion and movie industries. After we have defeated the globalists and dealt justice to their minions and enforcers, history will acknowledge your siding with humanity. A quick knuckle, mate.
Well put, especially your point that what Hollywood finds 'offensive' doesn't align with what us everyday folk find offensive!
Any ad featuring children in a sexualised context is wrong. The fact that this company focused primarily on the SCOTUS paper, ignoring the apparent entire tone of the ad, is just gross.
Fashion companies have been doing it for decades. I remember Manolo Blahnik and, I think, Calvin Klein in the 80s and 90s, with sexualised ads involving little boys in underwear. Very sad and disturbing. Sick bastards. And, of course, the staple fashion trope of abnormally-thin young women looking unhappy, drugged and even physically abused as being 'cool' and desirable. 'Heroin chic'.
https://rumble.com/v1xg2ua-balenciaga-tied-to-epstein-island-and-rachel-chandler-and-why-is-kim-kardas.html
Few details in there you might find interesting. I haven’t vetted