A Rebuttal To Dr Pierre Kory

Anecdotes of American ICU adventures simply do not translate

Dr Pierre Kory — an American doctor with no first hand UK experience — opined a Substack, seemingly out of guilt, titled “A Contrarian Opinion Regarding The Massive Increase In The Use of Sedatives And Opiates In UK Nursing Homes In Early 2020”.

The article appears to be a flimsy attempt at a damage control piece in direct response to The Daily Beagle’s published report “Mass Murdering Of The Elderly”, where we exposed a major cover-up to administer the elderly with Midazolam Hydrochloride, Haloperidol and Levomepromazine — all in injectable form — which resulted in an abnormal spike of deaths reclassified as ‘dementia’ during April 2020.

Emotional Ad Hominems

Dr Kory immediately opens with an emotional appeal by suggesting he himself is not disturbed by the sudden spike in drug usage in April 2020 (despite the fact the pandemic was well underway before then), and instead decides to project and suggest interpretation of the plain-as-day evidence as-is, is “malevolent”, which is a fallacious emotional appeal:

Frankly, it doesn’t matter what you think Dr Kory, because the evidence it is wrong is overwhelming, even being admitted in independent peer-review papers and contraindicated for use by the UK government itself. Berating us to ‘stay in our lane’ isn’t much of a rebuttal either.

Anecdotes But No Proof

Indeed, Dr Kory’s rebuttal consists of zero citation data, absolutely no references, and no proof, besides his anecdotal adventures in American ICUs (The Daily Beagle could not find a single link to any externalised data and we’ve kept an archived copy here for reference in-case this changes):

This is despite the fact Dr Kory lampshades the fact care homes are not ICUs, which immediately invalidates his frame of reference. What is appropriate in an ICU setting is not appropriate in a care home setting, and care home staff are not ICU-trained ward staff, nor do they have access to ICU equipment.

Dr Kory relies on this lengthy anecdote to obfuscate from the fact he simply hasn’t got any evidence to back up his case.

His Claims Were Already Refuted In Article

In-fact, his argument parrots that of Dr Amy Profitt, an individual whose position was refuted within the Mass Murdering Of The Elderly article, which rebutts:

Dr Amy Proffitt, a shill for the mass murder campaign, tried to insist that Midazolam would be an “obvious choice” for breathing difficulties and that it wouldn’t “hasten or prolong someone’s death”, despite the fact it makes breathing more difficult, and is not authorised for such usage, and results in death, as admitted by even the UK government

It is odd that Dr Kory glosses over and ignores all the evidence — including from the UK government itself — that clearly shows it has a negative effect on health, and instead makes a gaslighting appeal to sympathy that they were only “trying to save them”:

Gaslights On Treatment Availability

He complains no treatment options were available, but actually Hydroxychloroquine was well known by April 2020, and I personally would know… I promoted it to the UK government back in Febuary 2020. And there was absolutely no shortage of that stuff back then. Nor were anti-coagulants in short supply (warfarin — very common) nor anti-inflammatories (ibuprofen — literally over-the-counter).

In-fact, 3rd April 2020 was exactly the same day the hydroxychloroquine trials started in the UK. The exact same day NICE issued abborant guidance to use Midazolam. Oops.

So Dr Kory appeals to a magical shortage of treatments that simply wasn’t there, and to ignorance that simply wasn’t the case.

Waffles About Ventilators

Life support machines are only really used in ICU and aren’t typically features in care homes. Regardless of your thoughts on “ventilators, acute dialysis, and ECMO”, they have zero bearing of relevance on injectable drugs:

In another section, instead of discussing the abnormal usage of sedatives that were off-label and completely inappropriate, he then waffles again about how ‘ICU patients will die’ and that ‘machines do not make us immortal’.

We’re not talking about machines, Dr Kory. None of this is irrelevant, and shows you’re distracting from the fact you don’t actually have a rebuttal for the evidence and arguments presented.

Again, more sleight-of-hand that does not address nor rebut the main premise.

Contradicts On The End Outcomes

Dr Kory insists the drugs were meant to ‘save lives’:

But right in the opening he’s supposedly not surprised there were so many deaths:

If a drug was supposed to save lives, it would be extremely surprising there were so many deaths, because it would suggest either:

1. The drugs don’t actually save lives, or

2. The drugs kill

And we can tell which of the two it is, because the drugs, all, increase, mortality.

Engages In A Strawman Argument

Dr Kory oversimplifies the article’s evidence and overfocuses on pedantry of terms. He omits the part where evidence of the usage of such drugs (which he oddly keeps calling sedatives despite being used in an antipsychotic context) were clearly inappropriate, and does not treat not ‘aid’ with COVID-19 symptomology:

Bearing in mind Dr Kory basically admits he administered such drugs within the article, and thus has a major legal conflict-of-interest to downplay the murder aspects.

If it’s found he was ‘just following orders’ to administer such drugs under guidance that had zero legal protection (read: no marketing authorisation), he would find himself personally liable. Not legal advice, but the observation and implication are there. So naturally, he will insist with all of his might and vigour that it wasn’t murder — because by implication he is personally on the hook as well.

He even admits he was involved in “end-of-life conversations” that families “readily accepted” his assessments:

That does not make you an impartial judge of the facts, Dr Kory. In-fact, conflict-of-interest disclosure is required.

Engages In Pedantry

Dr Kory believes if he reframes intentional killing as a “mercy killing”, and tries to reframe the inappropriate, off-label (not authorised) usage of drugs as ‘palliative care’, it will somehow make the guilt complex go away:

Re-wording it when you’ve inappropriately killed the elderly following substandard government procedures advising unnecessary injections does not bring the dead back to life, Dr Kory, not does it absolve you or anyone else of their crimes.

Intent is a matter for courts to decide. Following murderous procedures that are ill-advised and contrary to labelling strongly suggests mass murder.

Dr Kory Outright Gaslights

Dr Kory proposes people “get confused” that opioids will suppress respiration:

They’re not ‘confused’ Dr Kory. It is literally a stated side-effect which even the UK government admits to. You’re outright lying. You’re in a losing fight.

benzodiazepines (and benzodiazepine-like drugs) and opioid medicines (opioids) can both cause respiratory depression; when used together, additive effects on the central nervous system increase the risks of sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and death

Dr Kory Appeals To The Broken Medical System

‘It will police itself’, he cries.

Really? Like how the medical system ‘policed itself’ when it came to the harms of vaccines? Has anyone at the CDC gone to jail for publishing fabricated evidence Kory?

You certainly haven’t called it out despite the overwhelming evidence. In-fact, you yourself are defending your own involvement in the matter, evidence to the contrary!

Appeal To The Whistleblower Fallacy

Dr Kory appeals to the whistleblower. Crime doesn’t exist unless there’s a whistleblower behind every door to report it!

One problem: Dr Kory ignores the fact whistleblowers already came forward to The Daily Mail to report such wrongdoing. Must be the wrong type of whistleblower!

Appeal To ‘Because They Can, They Do’ Fallacy

Dr Kory tries to appeal to the fact that because doctors and nurses know how to dilute vials, they must be diluting it (with no evidence) by maliciously and offhandedly saying “who cares”. The people whose families were murdered care, Kory.

Dr Kory can rob a bank, therefore he’s already committed the crime! Arrest him officer!

He course he conveniently ignores the fact the NICE advise the full 10mg strength for adults. No dilution. Oops!

The Only Counter-Argument He Puts Forward

Dr Kory asserts that the abnormal spike in April 2020, along with the abnormal spike of deaths in April 2020 — under dementia, note — was due to COVID-19 pathways:

This was resoundly refuted by the Mass Murdering Of The Elderly with extensive evidence, including contraindications showing the drugs were not suitable for the elderly, were not authorised for such usage, had negative respiratory effects, and such deaths were not classified as COVID-19 deaths, and the spike was unique to April 2020.

Further, we have evidence that the guidance was non-standard, given the NICE published it in 3rd April 2020, just as the drug buying spree in England started. This wasn’t some casual, coincidential event. It was preplanned.

If it was due to an on-going pandemic, you would expect a continuous trend of deaths and drugs. Not a sudden rushed spike in April and then no further purchases. What, did SARS-CoV-2 forget to kill in all the other months? How particularly absurd!

Appeals To Just Ignoring The Evidence - No Reason Given

Failing his weird assortment of anecdotes of adventures in ICUs, Dr Kory then weirdly appeals to the reader to just outright ignore all the graphs and datasets. He has spoken, the field expert has deemed this truth null and void, statistics, evidence, etc be damned!

Stop intepreting the data peon! You’re not qualified! Only slave master Dr Kory may wield the Sword of Truth and all who are beholden may not defy him and his words of wisdom about irrelevant ICU interventions in a completely different setting in an entirely different country!

We hope this rebuttal strikes at the heart of truth and this misleading information is put to bed quickly!