Those deformed or incomplete bits of mRNA can, or even likely will, produce prions. Prions are bad, which makes the whole mRNA integrity issue much worse.
Protection from liability does not shield them if it is in fact "defective product", and not in the case of "willful misconduct".
There are quite a few more things Steve Kirsch at al. are not doing. They are talking about crimes, but not about lawsuits, not really trying to do anything about it. For example. How come no one has even tried to summon FBI to investigate safety of the vaccines and potentially the biggest crime in human history? How come no one is suing FDA and CDC for willful or criminal misconduct, gross negligence and involuntary homicide, while many claim that is what happened, and is still happening? How come no one is suing Pfizer for selling defective product, while many claim that is what it actually is?
The trade deal the US government secured with Pfizer was never made public, even as the FDA is forced to turn over documents relating to Pfizer to the public that have exposed documents showing adverse effects. I'm confident the US government - as did other governments - agreed provisions similarly.
In the article "Healthcare Reform: Revoking Immunity" (https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/healthcare-reform-revoking-immunity) I suggest that immunity to liability violates the Seventh Amendment of the US Constitution, and thus could be overturned. I pushed that proposal to Children's Health Defense but they didn't respond. Not being a US citizen, not being an injured defendant, and neither having the finances nor legal expertise, I am in no position to drive this home.
"How come no one is suing FDA and CDC for willful or criminal misconduct, gross negligence and involuntary homicide, while many claim that is what happened, and is still happening?"
Because it is very likely they will all profess ignorance and you will have an uphill battle on your hands to prove otherwise. I'm convinced they are guilty of such things, however criminal proceedings are largely a police affair, and the police - being part of said government - aren't interested in exposing such crimes.
My task here isn't to push prosecution, my task is to get appropriate experts to analyse these texts appropriately, such the full extent of any crime or wrongdoing can be meaningfully exposed.
Have you tried contacting Dr Naomi Wolf on GETTR or her website https://dailyclout.io I don’t know why Steve would ignore this information or you but Naomi responds to everyone and her staff follow up.
I contacted Dr Naomi Wolf via email, and also mentioned the CDC censorship emails in the same pass. Naomi said she referred the CDC censorship article to her advisors, but did not mention the EMA leak documents in the respondent email, and asked if I had anything more on the censorship.
I have sent a follow up response re-asking if she is interested in a copy of the EMA leak documents, and also providing what I know on the CDC censorship emails. I'm pending a response, but I don't feel comfortable about the fact the EMA leak documents was entirely omitted in the first email response.
I will certainly give Naomi a try. I must admit was not aware she had a direct email (I would have never of guessed 'dailyclout' was her domain). I wanted to contact her earlier to notify that the CDC censorship emails (see: https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/what-the-cdc-censorship-emails-show) suggests she may have a First Amendment legal case as well, although I was only aware of her Twitter account.
"I also submitted copies to WikiLeaks a while back but I notice they haven’t published it either, which seems a bit odd."
As a long time WikiLeaks supporter I can say it's not odd at all. Given the huge resources dedicated to saving Julian Assange from slow death at the hands of DoJ there's far less skilled talent available to vet the submitted documents. There is also no public listing of submissions now under review for release. As many know WikiLeaks has NEVER had fraudulent documents they have 100% accuracy record and that takes staffing that cannot effectively deal with all the submissions plus fight for survival.
I watched your video and it struck me this must be the explanation for the insane lot variability uncovered by Craig Pardekooper on how bad is my batch. Mike Yeadon has commented extensively on this.
Sep 1, 2022·edited Sep 1, 2022Liked by The Underdog
Here's what I found out about the MHRA, EMA, CHMP and the covid jabs from various FOIs to the UK Government departments, the MHRA and DHSC - all available to whoever wants them as part of an investigation:
The conundrum surrounding adverse events has always been twofold - why are they so bad for some people (and apparently not for others) and why do they cause just a wide array of diseases? The discoveries elaborated in this article and accompanying beautiful video provide another piece of the puzzle. We now see evidence of the following:
*The LNPs cross blood-organ barriers to produce spike and fragment proteins inside vital organs
*Sometimes administration of the shot results in the gunk staying in a stagnant spot, and sometimes it lands in a busy “traffic zone” that takes it everywhere very quickly
*LNP integrity is highly variable, being affected by light, storage, physical shock/vibration in transit
*mRNA integrity is similarly highly variable
*Degraded mRNA can produce large amounts of odd proteins that can cause unknown effects, possibly prion issues and autoimmune disorders
*There are unknown toxic contaminants that vary from batch to batch
Some of these issues are likely to affect other injectable products as well.
It’s no wonder that we observe such a diversity of outcomes.
"Sometimes administration of the shot results in the gunk staying in a stagnant spot, and sometimes it lands in a busy “traffic zone” that takes it everywhere very quickly"
John Campbell - despite my rebuttals to the man originally - offers one insight for this, although I've heard counterpoints from other vaccine administrators - mentions if a shot isn't administered with 'aspiration' (a specific breathing technique), it can accidentally hit a vein instead of the muscle, as the shots are meant(?) to be administered 'intramuscularly' ('into the muscles'), as opposed to intravenously ('into the veins').
That said, nurses and other experts in cardiovascular systems (the blood vessels and the like) have all commented any muscular deposits will eventually work their way into the bloodstream because micro-veins are found everywhere in a muscle - and they have to be, in order to supply it with energy and oxygen.
To me, this suggests a time delay and exposure duration. Hitting a vein directly is likely to be worse, sooner, because it gains biodistribution to the whole body. Hitting a muscle means whatever events occurs slower, over a longer period of time - so less immediate, but occurs over a longer span of time.
There's quite a few confounding variables. So a more immediate release is going to be harder to manage symptoms wise because it'll be a lot of things suddenly at once.
A slower release *might* be manageable (not necessarily treatable) with drugs etc that suppress outward symptomology, making the time-correlation much harder to spot. That is to say, the symptoms will be so low level from the start in intramuscular, no-one will associate it to the shot unless/until they get so badly injured or die from it, and even then, it may be several years before that occurs (auto-immune disorders can take up to 10 years to emerge), which ultimately means it won't be strongly associated to it.
Then there is the lifestyle choices of the recipients themselves. So myocarditis is typically fatal in people who aren't aware they have it, and are very physically active. Because the heart is already damaged, straining it further during peak physical exercise effectively causes more dead and damaged cells to break off, which in turn causes both heart and blood vessel issues. Which is why you see so many athletes in peak physical condition dying, but not overweight couch potatoes.
So the fatalities themselves are only noticeable *if* they exert themselves beyond a limit physically. So what you will want to start doing is *also recording retirements*. Specifically early retirements with no logical reason to them where the person quits the sport entirely. This would be signs they were advised by their doctor to stop playing and to stop engaging in athletic exercise which would cause their heart strain. I know there hasn't been much reporting on retirements because people haven't known to look.
Injection into muscle in a spot away from large-size vasculature should give the LNPs more time to be taken up into local cells, reducing the burden on the organs. Where the expressed and freed proteins go, however is another story.
I began to question the role Kirsch is really playing since way back at the beginning of all of this…I watched one of the first conferences that Robert Malone had…for a silicon Valley group and the moment I heard someone in the audience ask him about the animal trials in which the animals all died…Malone responded by saying he knew NOTHING about them. I KNEW at that moment he lied. He had to have known. And just today I watched Malone in a current interview in which he refers to isolation of this or that retro virus…he also mentions having had spoken to Martin…I still believe in David Martin but Malone and Kirsch and Weinstein no more for me. Nope.
Per the article, I need appropriate contact details that meet the listed criterion. Many famous people intentionally make themselves difficult to contact, for obvious reasons.
Sent an email, despite his being on vacation he replied - likely because I've got Kirsch's support now. He has accepted a copy of the documents, although as he's on vacation until Sept 5th it is unlikely you won't hear anything until then.
It looks like Kirsch has finally responded. Nice work.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/documents-leaked-from-the-ema-confirms
Those deformed or incomplete bits of mRNA can, or even likely will, produce prions. Prions are bad, which makes the whole mRNA integrity issue much worse.
Protection from liability does not shield them if it is in fact "defective product", and not in the case of "willful misconduct".
There are quite a few more things Steve Kirsch at al. are not doing. They are talking about crimes, but not about lawsuits, not really trying to do anything about it. For example. How come no one has even tried to summon FBI to investigate safety of the vaccines and potentially the biggest crime in human history? How come no one is suing FDA and CDC for willful or criminal misconduct, gross negligence and involuntary homicide, while many claim that is what happened, and is still happening? How come no one is suing Pfizer for selling defective product, while many claim that is what it actually is?
"Protection from liability does not shield them if it is in fact "defective product""
It goes beyond that. According to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, Pfizer made sure to include immunity from fraud in contracts they were agreeing with other countries (see: https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2021-02-23/held-to-ransom-pfizer-demands-governments-gamble-with-state-assets-to-secure-vaccine-deal).
The trade deal the US government secured with Pfizer was never made public, even as the FDA is forced to turn over documents relating to Pfizer to the public that have exposed documents showing adverse effects. I'm confident the US government - as did other governments - agreed provisions similarly.
In the article "Healthcare Reform: Revoking Immunity" (https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/healthcare-reform-revoking-immunity) I suggest that immunity to liability violates the Seventh Amendment of the US Constitution, and thus could be overturned. I pushed that proposal to Children's Health Defense but they didn't respond. Not being a US citizen, not being an injured defendant, and neither having the finances nor legal expertise, I am in no position to drive this home.
"How come no one is suing FDA and CDC for willful or criminal misconduct, gross negligence and involuntary homicide, while many claim that is what happened, and is still happening?"
Because it is very likely they will all profess ignorance and you will have an uphill battle on your hands to prove otherwise. I'm convinced they are guilty of such things, however criminal proceedings are largely a police affair, and the police - being part of said government - aren't interested in exposing such crimes.
My task here isn't to push prosecution, my task is to get appropriate experts to analyse these texts appropriately, such the full extent of any crime or wrongdoing can be meaningfully exposed.
I would not expect any help from the fbi
They are doing everything but what actually needs to be done.
Have you tried contacting Dr Naomi Wolf on GETTR or her website https://dailyclout.io I don’t know why Steve would ignore this information or you but Naomi responds to everyone and her staff follow up.
I contacted Dr Naomi Wolf via email, and also mentioned the CDC censorship emails in the same pass. Naomi said she referred the CDC censorship article to her advisors, but did not mention the EMA leak documents in the respondent email, and asked if I had anything more on the censorship.
I have sent a follow up response re-asking if she is interested in a copy of the EMA leak documents, and also providing what I know on the CDC censorship emails. I'm pending a response, but I don't feel comfortable about the fact the EMA leak documents was entirely omitted in the first email response.
I will certainly give Naomi a try. I must admit was not aware she had a direct email (I would have never of guessed 'dailyclout' was her domain). I wanted to contact her earlier to notify that the CDC censorship emails (see: https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/what-the-cdc-censorship-emails-show) suggests she may have a First Amendment legal case as well, although I was only aware of her Twitter account.
https://www.covidtruths.co.uk/2021/04/ema-leaked-papers/ speaking of EMA...
"I also submitted copies to WikiLeaks a while back but I notice they haven’t published it either, which seems a bit odd."
As a long time WikiLeaks supporter I can say it's not odd at all. Given the huge resources dedicated to saving Julian Assange from slow death at the hands of DoJ there's far less skilled talent available to vet the submitted documents. There is also no public listing of submissions now under review for release. As many know WikiLeaks has NEVER had fraudulent documents they have 100% accuracy record and that takes staffing that cannot effectively deal with all the submissions plus fight for survival.
Web page: https://corona-investigative-committee.com/; led by Reiner Fuellmich (https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish). They have a specific contact for whistleblowers. Thank you for your work!
I watched your video and it struck me this must be the explanation for the insane lot variability uncovered by Craig Pardekooper on how bad is my batch. Mike Yeadon has commented extensively on this.
https://howbadismybatch.com/
Here's what I found out about the MHRA, EMA, CHMP and the covid jabs from various FOIs to the UK Government departments, the MHRA and DHSC - all available to whoever wants them as part of an investigation:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/mhra-ema-and-the-chmp
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/3-simple-easy-to-answer-questions
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/why-no-meaningful-biodistribution
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/uk-changed-the-law-to-make-the-covid
The MHRA aren't much better regulating the PCR and LFD tests either:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/let-me-tell-you-a-story-about-lfts
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/the-lft-saga-continues
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/pcr-tests
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/ukhsa-admits-that-they-gave-me-a
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/no-gold-standard-test-for-transmissible
As I said at the top, all original FOIs available.
Or these snippets:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/first-uk-covid-legislation-dates
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/vallance-farrar-drosten-fauci-and
And as you say in your article - no-one wants to listen.
The conundrum surrounding adverse events has always been twofold - why are they so bad for some people (and apparently not for others) and why do they cause just a wide array of diseases? The discoveries elaborated in this article and accompanying beautiful video provide another piece of the puzzle. We now see evidence of the following:
*The LNPs cross blood-organ barriers to produce spike and fragment proteins inside vital organs
*Sometimes administration of the shot results in the gunk staying in a stagnant spot, and sometimes it lands in a busy “traffic zone” that takes it everywhere very quickly
*LNP integrity is highly variable, being affected by light, storage, physical shock/vibration in transit
*mRNA integrity is similarly highly variable
*Degraded mRNA can produce large amounts of odd proteins that can cause unknown effects, possibly prion issues and autoimmune disorders
*There are unknown toxic contaminants that vary from batch to batch
Some of these issues are likely to affect other injectable products as well.
It’s no wonder that we observe such a diversity of outcomes.
"Sometimes administration of the shot results in the gunk staying in a stagnant spot, and sometimes it lands in a busy “traffic zone” that takes it everywhere very quickly"
John Campbell - despite my rebuttals to the man originally - offers one insight for this, although I've heard counterpoints from other vaccine administrators - mentions if a shot isn't administered with 'aspiration' (a specific breathing technique), it can accidentally hit a vein instead of the muscle, as the shots are meant(?) to be administered 'intramuscularly' ('into the muscles'), as opposed to intravenously ('into the veins').
That said, nurses and other experts in cardiovascular systems (the blood vessels and the like) have all commented any muscular deposits will eventually work their way into the bloodstream because micro-veins are found everywhere in a muscle - and they have to be, in order to supply it with energy and oxygen.
To me, this suggests a time delay and exposure duration. Hitting a vein directly is likely to be worse, sooner, because it gains biodistribution to the whole body. Hitting a muscle means whatever events occurs slower, over a longer period of time - so less immediate, but occurs over a longer span of time.
There's quite a few confounding variables. So a more immediate release is going to be harder to manage symptoms wise because it'll be a lot of things suddenly at once.
A slower release *might* be manageable (not necessarily treatable) with drugs etc that suppress outward symptomology, making the time-correlation much harder to spot. That is to say, the symptoms will be so low level from the start in intramuscular, no-one will associate it to the shot unless/until they get so badly injured or die from it, and even then, it may be several years before that occurs (auto-immune disorders can take up to 10 years to emerge), which ultimately means it won't be strongly associated to it.
Then there is the lifestyle choices of the recipients themselves. So myocarditis is typically fatal in people who aren't aware they have it, and are very physically active. Because the heart is already damaged, straining it further during peak physical exercise effectively causes more dead and damaged cells to break off, which in turn causes both heart and blood vessel issues. Which is why you see so many athletes in peak physical condition dying, but not overweight couch potatoes.
So the fatalities themselves are only noticeable *if* they exert themselves beyond a limit physically. So what you will want to start doing is *also recording retirements*. Specifically early retirements with no logical reason to them where the person quits the sport entirely. This would be signs they were advised by their doctor to stop playing and to stop engaging in athletic exercise which would cause their heart strain. I know there hasn't been much reporting on retirements because people haven't known to look.
Great comment, thank you.
Injection into muscle in a spot away from large-size vasculature should give the LNPs more time to be taken up into local cells, reducing the burden on the organs. Where the expressed and freed proteins go, however is another story.
I began to question the role Kirsch is really playing since way back at the beginning of all of this…I watched one of the first conferences that Robert Malone had…for a silicon Valley group and the moment I heard someone in the audience ask him about the animal trials in which the animals all died…Malone responded by saying he knew NOTHING about them. I KNEW at that moment he lied. He had to have known. And just today I watched Malone in a current interview in which he refers to isolation of this or that retro virus…he also mentions having had spoken to Martin…I still believe in David Martin but Malone and Kirsch and Weinstein no more for me. Nope.
Malone is involved in developing RelCovax™, a second-generation multivalent SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate. this could well be the reason he's been profiling himself lately as both a victim and an opponent of the existent inoculations (competition) - https://www.unite4truth.com/post/what-is-relcovax-the-covid-19-vaccine-dr-robert-malone-pitched-at-summit-in-2021-nothing-good
Glad that Kirsch contacted you! He has a contact page but he doesn't post it in every article.
I'd contact Stew Peters @ protonmail.com I think is his email address.
His website is stewpeters.com
Or Red Voice Media.
Web page: https://corona-investigative-committee.com/; led by Reiner Fuellmich (https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish). They have a specific contact for whistleblowers. Thank you for your work!
What an excellently produced video! Congratulations on that, and apologies for the undeserved lack of attention your findings have received.
What about Dr Malone??
Per the article, I need appropriate contact details that meet the listed criterion. Many famous people intentionally make themselves difficult to contact, for obvious reasons.
Here is his substack:
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/trends-in-covid-anxiety?r=ft46p&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Unfortunately only paid subscribers appear to be able to comment on his Substack, so this leaves me with no means of communication.
Do you have an email address or contact form?
pls don't go there. Malone's not our friend and is involved in developing RelCovax™, a second-generation multivalent SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate. this could well be the reason he's been profiling himself lately as both a victim and an opponent of the existent inoculations (competition) - https://www.unite4truth.com/post/what-is-relcovax-the-covid-19-vaccine-dr-robert-malone-pitched-at-summit-in-2021-nothing-good
https://twitter.com/thackerpd
Sent an email, despite his being on vacation he replied - likely because I've got Kirsch's support now. He has accepted a copy of the documents, although as he's on vacation until Sept 5th it is unlikely you won't hear anything until then.
As you may know, Paul Thacker exposed the Pfizer/Ventavia fraud with the help of whistleblower Brooks Jackson. Hope he can expand on the EMA leak.
I'll attempt to approach him shortly given he has an email address.