You claim the post I wrote is 'great', but then post a wall of text insisting viruses are a hoax.
You obviously don't believe your own crap, because, one, my post details how viruses cause cancer, and if you truly believed your discredit-by-association worldview, you wouldn't be calling my post - in disagreement with your own position - 'great' (so, manipulative flattery, really).
Two, if you truly believed your own worldview, which, lets face it, you obviously don't, you wouldn't be posting on a article by someone who is clearly of the view viruses are real, and;
Three, if you had a valid justification, you would have answered my question, rather than suspiciously deflecting my question with another question. So yes, by your own logic you shouldn't be here, so I repeat my question again: Why are you here?
Well, firstly, it is my Substack, so I do hold a say who does take part, but the question isn't a challenge as to association, it is a challenge on reasoning.
You say you're willing to learn something new, but you evidently haven't actually read the post, because the ideas you are advocating - nay, shilling - are not compatible with the information proposed.
If you're willing to learn, answer me this: how can the adenovirus cause cancer if viruses do not exist? Why would you be interested in the work of a man who writes about viruses - monkeypox virus, SARS-CoV-2, polio - if you insist they do not exist?
Or to flip the script, why learn on a subject you insist cannot be real? If viruses aren't real, why are you wasting your time learning about them?
Your actions are an enigma. I put it to you that you're here to spread false narratives. You don't actually care what my writings say, you just want to associate bad ideas with them and then be on your merry way. I don't think so.
Thank you for your contribution. Very interesting indeed.
Respect
extremely helpful, thank you so much!
Halo says hello from his favorite billiards hookah lounge: https://youtu.be/9NE9Bv26x2g
If it is a hoax, then why are you here?
Perhaps your morals are funnier.
You claim the post I wrote is 'great', but then post a wall of text insisting viruses are a hoax.
You obviously don't believe your own crap, because, one, my post details how viruses cause cancer, and if you truly believed your discredit-by-association worldview, you wouldn't be calling my post - in disagreement with your own position - 'great' (so, manipulative flattery, really).
Two, if you truly believed your own worldview, which, lets face it, you obviously don't, you wouldn't be posting on a article by someone who is clearly of the view viruses are real, and;
Three, if you had a valid justification, you would have answered my question, rather than suspiciously deflecting my question with another question. So yes, by your own logic you shouldn't be here, so I repeat my question again: Why are you here?
Well, firstly, it is my Substack, so I do hold a say who does take part, but the question isn't a challenge as to association, it is a challenge on reasoning.
You say you're willing to learn something new, but you evidently haven't actually read the post, because the ideas you are advocating - nay, shilling - are not compatible with the information proposed.
If you're willing to learn, answer me this: how can the adenovirus cause cancer if viruses do not exist? Why would you be interested in the work of a man who writes about viruses - monkeypox virus, SARS-CoV-2, polio - if you insist they do not exist?
Or to flip the script, why learn on a subject you insist cannot be real? If viruses aren't real, why are you wasting your time learning about them?
Your actions are an enigma. I put it to you that you're here to spread false narratives. You don't actually care what my writings say, you just want to associate bad ideas with them and then be on your merry way. I don't think so.