Before the deliberate release of Covid and the recent useless, but dangerous injection, they call a vaccine, we trusted Doctors and to a certain extent 'Authority'. But now we've learned the system has been distorted beyond recognition, the best policy is to suspect everyone and everything. It's the safer approach to our survival in this evil world that's emerged since 2020.
The 'EXPERIMENTAL' jabs that many have blindly accepted, at best, could come from spoiled batches, or a placebo (if such a thing ever existed since Covid was created and deliberately released) they might have dodged the bullet.
The more likely scenario is that every person that received any/all of the pretend 'VACCINE' will endure permanent Genetically Modified inherent problems, a shorter life expectancy, the return of previously historical illnesses, turbo cancers, and a general vulnerability to all future virus born illnesses and diseases.
The poisonous injection is meant to do all of the above, is PERMANENT and hereditary!
That's what is being proven with every day that this NO LIABILITY injection is allowed to be peddled by those that mean us harm!
This is the very crux of everything, UD, what is real. Politicians are actors merely picking issues to keep people at odds while agreeing in principle on anything that matters: Iraq, Ukraine, "too big to fail," Russia Bad, Jabs Good, on and on. Abortion and Alphabet Mafia are distraction issues.
This fake war is carried over into everything. Look at the gatekeeping that goes on in the so-called Medical Freedom Movement. Bob Malone and Alex Berenson squabbling on TV is a perfect example. It's all theater for the masses and technology will only enable further skullduggery. Who needs deep fakes when AI can just whip something up.
A final thought brings to mind Israel/Palestine right now. Hamas was supported at times by the Israelis to offset the more popular PLO. Talk about an attack designed to enflame an opponent rather than inflict damage upon Israel. Soon after the dead baby pics are making the rounds, almost like smashed incubators, except wait they were fake, AI-generated images.
Wait until next year as this technology refines rapidly.
Both before, and as a journalist, I had deep thoughts on free speech and journalism for a while, and something I pondered was how did the masses 'get informed' pre-Internet?
They would have received a centralised newspaper; it would have told them what to think. Before then, distorted rumour and gossip, much like what we see on social media, would have been the closest to 'free' speech, but would have had the same errors, distortions, manipulations and misattributions (even by well meaning folks) we see now.
I often wonder what would happen if people had ignored newspapers or TV. But I recognise what would have happened is the governments would have gone to various wars, and the public would be totally oblivious! So instead of being misinformed and told lies about why there's a war, you wouldn't have even known there was a war occurring!
I think the invention of the internet is something that occurred almost accidentally, unintentionally, if you will, purely out of necessity to survive nuclear war but not intended for the masses. I don't think the globalists were prepared for the high speed transfer of knowledge and information it would bring, largely unfiltered and uncensored.
It is why mainstream old media seems so sluggish and slow. They have to get their material pre-approved by some government agency, and make sure all their lies align with all the others. If something new comes out, it takes them ages to work out how to refute it.
Meanwhile, smaller journalism outlets like The Daily Beagle, and social media outlets, just need to do verification of the accuracy of statements and then publish, which zips by most mainstream media.
It's a good title. I could be wrong, but I don't think the globalists' objective is to intentionally foster a Zero-Trust Environment. In-fact, I think they want very much the opposite; they want a blind trust in authority, to follow the 'fact checkers' and not listen to the naysaying conspiracy theorists; blue checks, 'experts', carefully crafted repetition of dialogue designed to be memorised ('safe and effective').
Perhaps they want a Zero-Trust Environment so they can try to force verification checks, spyware and the like, but I feel ultimately the intended end return goal is 'trust us'. I just don't think that is going to be possible.
Before the deliberate release of Covid and the recent useless, but dangerous injection, they call a vaccine, we trusted Doctors and to a certain extent 'Authority'. But now we've learned the system has been distorted beyond recognition, the best policy is to suspect everyone and everything. It's the safer approach to our survival in this evil world that's emerged since 2020.
The 'EXPERIMENTAL' jabs that many have blindly accepted, at best, could come from spoiled batches, or a placebo (if such a thing ever existed since Covid was created and deliberately released) they might have dodged the bullet.
The more likely scenario is that every person that received any/all of the pretend 'VACCINE' will endure permanent Genetically Modified inherent problems, a shorter life expectancy, the return of previously historical illnesses, turbo cancers, and a general vulnerability to all future virus born illnesses and diseases.
The poisonous injection is meant to do all of the above, is PERMANENT and hereditary!
That's what is being proven with every day that this NO LIABILITY injection is allowed to be peddled by those that mean us harm!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!
This is the very crux of everything, UD, what is real. Politicians are actors merely picking issues to keep people at odds while agreeing in principle on anything that matters: Iraq, Ukraine, "too big to fail," Russia Bad, Jabs Good, on and on. Abortion and Alphabet Mafia are distraction issues.
This fake war is carried over into everything. Look at the gatekeeping that goes on in the so-called Medical Freedom Movement. Bob Malone and Alex Berenson squabbling on TV is a perfect example. It's all theater for the masses and technology will only enable further skullduggery. Who needs deep fakes when AI can just whip something up.
A final thought brings to mind Israel/Palestine right now. Hamas was supported at times by the Israelis to offset the more popular PLO. Talk about an attack designed to enflame an opponent rather than inflict damage upon Israel. Soon after the dead baby pics are making the rounds, almost like smashed incubators, except wait they were fake, AI-generated images.
Wait until next year as this technology refines rapidly.
If no one in the world watched television, they wouldn't have pulled the 911 psyop. That's what I've been saying for the last 22 years.
However unlikely, that would be the *opposite* inflexion point, where people only trust their own eyes.
Both before, and as a journalist, I had deep thoughts on free speech and journalism for a while, and something I pondered was how did the masses 'get informed' pre-Internet?
They would have received a centralised newspaper; it would have told them what to think. Before then, distorted rumour and gossip, much like what we see on social media, would have been the closest to 'free' speech, but would have had the same errors, distortions, manipulations and misattributions (even by well meaning folks) we see now.
I often wonder what would happen if people had ignored newspapers or TV. But I recognise what would have happened is the governments would have gone to various wars, and the public would be totally oblivious! So instead of being misinformed and told lies about why there's a war, you wouldn't have even known there was a war occurring!
I think the invention of the internet is something that occurred almost accidentally, unintentionally, if you will, purely out of necessity to survive nuclear war but not intended for the masses. I don't think the globalists were prepared for the high speed transfer of knowledge and information it would bring, largely unfiltered and uncensored.
It is why mainstream old media seems so sluggish and slow. They have to get their material pre-approved by some government agency, and make sure all their lies align with all the others. If something new comes out, it takes them ages to work out how to refute it.
Meanwhile, smaller journalism outlets like The Daily Beagle, and social media outlets, just need to do verification of the accuracy of statements and then publish, which zips by most mainstream media.
Wow
It's a good title. I could be wrong, but I don't think the globalists' objective is to intentionally foster a Zero-Trust Environment. In-fact, I think they want very much the opposite; they want a blind trust in authority, to follow the 'fact checkers' and not listen to the naysaying conspiracy theorists; blue checks, 'experts', carefully crafted repetition of dialogue designed to be memorised ('safe and effective').
Perhaps they want a Zero-Trust Environment so they can try to force verification checks, spyware and the like, but I feel ultimately the intended end return goal is 'trust us'. I just don't think that is going to be possible.
Sounds like you're encouraging distrust in my words.
Do you think you can convince people with arguments in abuse?
I can't help but notice your Substack is barely a month old.
Okay, I'm not going to have you shitting up my substack spreading FUD Mr Sock Account. Have a nice day now.