Why You Shouldn't Trust Ukraine's Blacklist
Guess who's Matt, Matt again...
Highlighting the oppressive nature of Ukrainian leadership, apparently not particularly busy with fighting the war with Russia, they opted to waste time and criticise anyone outside of Ukraine who wasn’t fully onboard with their agenda with a blacklist.
Zelensky is not content oppressing the opposition parties or other media outlets in Ukraine, which western media outlets tried to disgustingly cover for by making vague, unevidenced insinuations of ‘ties to Russia’; what, for all 11 opposition parties? Noticeably the only one exempt was Zelensky’s own party. Suspicious.
Democracy is optional in times of war, is it? Accuse them of ties then suppress? In contrast, during the outbreak of World War 2, Britain’s response wasn’t to suppress other parties… it was to expand it so more of the parties could have a say in what was going on.
Countries outside of Zelensky’s ironfist reach however, aren’t subject to such oppression, and it clearly annoys Ukraine enough they’ve started blacklisting anyone who dares to criticise them and their corruption from outside, too. I thought they were supposed to be fighting Russia, not us?
However Ukraine’s oppressive assessments should not be trusted, because not only are the reasons for wanting to blacklist people often one or two lines (in relation to mere words the people had freely spoken), a shallow context for such opposition, but they didn’t even properly proofread their own blacklist. Oops.
Matt Robson of New Zealand…
…meet Matt Robson of New Zealand! With the exact same reasons (nice copy-paste)…
If the Ukrainian government couldn’t be bothered to get their one-minute hatespeech blacklist accurate enough to be duplicate records free - either that or I guess they must hate anyone called ‘Matt Robson’ in New Zealand - they cannot be trusted in the accuracy of their hitpiece.
They don’t even know what the person they’re even accusing looks like given the two completely different images - which is another red flag not to trust the list. The copy-paste of reasons is the cherry-on-top, because it suggests whichever intern they assigned to write this list just copied it over in a braindead fashion. Not even the slightest re-write. Minus points for plagurism.
For anyone curious, The Daily Beagle found this whilst transcribing the names of people on the list near-verbatim so they could have an easy, at-a-glance reference of who is on the list (order is top-left down, then top-right down; order is kept the same as the original):
Notables include copy freedoms advocate Kim Dotcom, US Senator Rand Paul (who gets a whopping three whole lines for the justification for his blacklist)…
…WEF member Tulsi Gabbard, French politician Marine Le Pen and journalist Glenn Greenwald. Unfortunately The Daily Beagle hasn’t made the list. Here’s to hoping.
If you like my work, be sure to support it by sharing the article link with other people, subscribing or even becoming a supporter. Thank you!
I think the emphasis on trusting the list is misguided. Regrettably, you should TRUST the list as it accurately reflects the Ukrainian leadership thinking. They think that the manipulation of the West is their prerogative, and those who see it through are their mortal enemies. Off with their heads! Global донос (delation), public denunciation) is a handy work of British Intelligence, an old practice perfected in Soviet Union times. to the tune of millions end to Soviet Gulag.