What the EMA Leak Tells Us On... Nanoparticles
It's all downhill from here...
mRNA instability is a difficult concept to grasp. It is likely difficult for the average person, and it is difficult for even the average non-specialist in medicine to grasp. The fact it is difficult to understand, both in terms of how it behaves and works, and in outcomes and consequences, is why alarm at such technologies being rushed through is warranted.
Not even the BMJ, which covered the mRNA instability issues of the EMA leak, had any clear answers. They were walled out by the firms insisting knowledge, and the BMJ’s own experts were not sure how biodistribution of the nanoparticles wrapped around the unstable mRNA proteins would unfold, quoting:
“At present, relatively little has been reported on the tissue localisation of the LNPs used to encase the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-encoding messenger RNA, and it is vital to have more specific information on precisely where the liposomal nanoparticles are going after injection.”
JW Ulm, a gene therapy specialist
Don’t worry if you went glassy-eyed over it, it’s my intention to guide you through to the best of my knowledge.
Terminology breakdown
(If you’re already familiar with the terminology feel free to skip to the next section)
LNP stands for liposomal nanoparticles. Nanoparticles is a fancy word for ‘small particles’, specifically, particles that are nano in size. Most people might conflate the word ‘nano’ with ‘robot’, such as ‘nanobots’, but nanoparticles can be both organic (naturally occurring) and non-organic (non-naturally occurring), and thus, not necessarily robots.
SARS-CoV-2 (short for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2) is the virus you’ve heard a lot about as of late (often mistakenly called ‘COVID-19’, which is actually the term that refers to the list of symptoms, not the virus itself).
Coronaviruses - the word ‘corona’ meaning ‘crown’ in Latin - have spikes around the outside, which when looking down, looks very crown-like, which is where they get their name. The spikes on the outside are encoded by RNA (Ribonucleic acid), which you might call the viruses’ programming language. These spikes are called spike proteins because the spikes are made out of proteins.
Now, the Pfizer mRNA shot does not work by including the entire virus, but instead their mRNA encodes for just the spike protein itself. Spike proteins, without a viral host body to attach to, are unstable, and RNA that is loose tends to want to unravel itself when exposed to the elements, so manufacturers try to ‘solve’ by wrapping their spike proteins in a sort of ‘cling film’ or protective oily layer - which is what the liposomal nanoparticles are used for.
At least, in theory.
In practice
Ulm’s question…
[…] it is vital to have more specific information on precisely where the liposomal nanoparticles are going after injection […]
…boils down to ‘where is all that cling film wrapping for the mRNA spike proteins even going’? Essentially, what happens to the waste material?
One very good guess is, as a free-floating toxin, the most likely destination, is, the liver.
The liver is the main organ in the body tasked with filtering poisons and toxins from the bloodstream. It is why alcoholics get liver damage after they drink too much alcohol, the toxicity overwhelms the liver’s ability to filter it out. It’s also where we’d expect any toxins from the mRNA shots to end up in the event it enters the bloodstream.
All aboard, next stop: the liver
You’re probably thinking to yourself, if the mRNA shots did indeed cause issues with the liver, we’d see it all over the news by now, right?
Not entirely true. Media outlets have no obligation to report health concerns or issues, besides a ‘moral duty’, and moral duty doesn’t pay the bills. You know what does? Pharmaceutical advertising money.
In 2018, it was estimated in the US, $2.5 billion was spent on advertising, this jumped to over $6.5 billion in 2020, with an alleged spend of $35.7 billion worldwide, with the US making up roughly 1/7th of the total expenditure.
That’s a lot of dough to say no to, and media outlets have rarely made the right moral decisions in recent years, with Washington Post being bought out by Amazon as a prime example of how easily media outlets sell out for money.
Pharmaceutical companies likely don’t buy out media outlets like Amazon, because it’d mean a much more obvious papertrail of collusion, than under-the-covers advertising money which doesn’t have to be publicly disclosed anywhere.
Even if the media outlets did report on the issues, there’s another resistive aspect, although it is a surmountable one - if the public so chooses. Unfamiliarity with medical terminology.
It turns out there have been reports, as of late, about liver damage, but it has largely either been identified by the medical term, hepatitis, or the cause of it declared “mysterious” by the all powerful health regulator forces who apparently know everything. It’s only “mysterious” if you intentionally ignore the causes.
Medical jargon to obsfucate
One of the oldest tricks in the book is to use jargon to obsfucate, in the hopes no-one bothers to learn the real meanings. It’s why I explain even ‘obvious’ jargon terms, as it’s only obvious once learnt.
Hepatitis - hepar from the Greek “hēpatos”, meaning ‘liver’, and ‘itis’, meaning ‘partaining to’ (partaining to the liver) - is characterised as an inflammation of the liver.
This might seem not that alarming, as you might have seen skin inflammation of your hands or legs that then goes away, but the liver is not designed to swell, and swelling, like your skin might swell if exposed to a toxin or irritant, is a bad sign as the liver is supposed to be able to handle toxins. This either means the liver is not coping, or the toxin is too powerful. Neither are good signs.
Yes, yes, get to the point: Show me the studies
Immune-mediated hepatitis with the Moderna vaccine is no longer a coincidence but confirmed
Autoimmune hepatitis after COVID vaccine
Autoimmune hepatitis triggered by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
Hepatitis C virus reactivation after COVID-19 vaccination: a case report
Autoimmune hepatitis developing after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (Oxford-AstraZeneca)
Autoimmune?
This is the part that gets harder to explain. Autoimmunity is a long, and complex subject, and I won’t be able to boil it down in a way that sufficiently encompasses the scope. I will try to summarise some of the knowledge so you’re least able to take something away.
People who used to watch the show “House” are probably familiar with the term “lupus”. Lupus is yet another auto-immune disease. The word ‘auto’ means ‘self’. So, effectively, ‘self-immune’.
This isn’t a good thing; it means your immune system has immunised itself against you; either a part of the body, specific organs or the entire body. It will proceed to attack that part of the body until it is destroyed. You can probably grasp why this is a problem if it starts attacking your liver. There aren’t many treatments beyond dialysis to filter white blood cells (WBCs) and immunosuppressants.
This isn’t just some far away, isolated cases for me, either, of which I am just dispassionately observing. A family member took the Swine Flu shot in 2009 and ended up with an auto-immune disease that almost killed them because of the ignorance of the doctors involved. It was only by demanding a second opinion did I manage to save their life.
An exception, a rare one at that. Many won’t know it until after the damage is done. They had deterioriated, not on the order of years or months like most would think, but rapidly over weeks. It was only my familiarity to how they normally handled illnesses that enabled me to contradict medical opinion that almost got them killed, and save their life in the process.
Autoimmune: How?
How or why is not clear, but there is a strong association between adjuvants in vaccines and autoimmune disorders. This is known as “ASIA syndrome” (Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants), and there are very few studies on the topic.
“Adjuvants” is another obscuring jargon term that means a chemical or agent added to the shot that is designed to provoke an “enhanced” (read: increased) immune response. It is very likely this “enhancement” is not at all desirable and likely leads to the body attacking itself by provoking the immune system to such an extent it sees the body itself as the threat.
This may not be the sole cause of autoimmune disorders, however in my view it is one of the strongest candidates. The strongest the scientific community are willing to investigate anyway, without criticising the false god that rules over them in the form of ‘vaccines’. No one medical product should be above scrutiny.
No amount of verbal abuse, or firing from jobs, or media attacks should grant exemption to such investigations, and if anything, such corruption should be investigated even further.