Vaccine Cult Uses Fake Account To Publish Attack Paper

Dodgy non-doctor with made-up affiliations posts in dodgy 'peer-review' outlet.

In desperation the vaccine pushers have now stooped to blaming those critical of vaccines as the ones ‘causing the side-effects’ in a desperate, Jim Jones-esque move of projection.

It’s particularly laughable because it tries to suggest words kill more people than the poison shots do:

Not only is the idea of words killing people absurd and completely unsound, this particularly pathetic one-man hitpiece is written by a non-doctor called ‘Raymond Palmer’, who claims to be the ‘chief science officer’ at a company called ‘Full Spectrum Biologics’:

Neither the self-proclaimed job title could be verified, nor the business at the addresses given, and ‘Raymond Palmer’ actually supplies two conflicting addresses on the PubMed referral:

Apparently he works at two addresses with the same job title at the same time. There is zero mention of any medical credentials, prior experiences, or even credentialed work of any sort, no LinkedIn page, no resume, no degree or University credentialed history, absolutely no prior history to suggest this account has any qualifications.

This account appears out of thin air and is a giant red flag for a sock account.

Raymond Fakes Affiliations

On another paper, “Aging clocks & mortality timers, methylation, glycomic, telomeric and more. A window to measuring biological age”, “Raymond” invents another non-existent affiliation using broken English, to the “School of Aging Science of Aging South Perth Western Australia Australia.”.

Lack of commas means it looks like they wrote Australia twice. Further, it is spelled “ageing” in Australia, not “aging” (an American spelling). There is no “School of Aging” or “Science of Aging” or “School of Aging Science of Aging” in South Perth, Australia. Searches come up blank and it looks patently dubious anyway.

“Raymond” re-uses the same spelling mistake in the title of another paper, showing the total lack of basic peer-review, in a clearly nonsense title about “outwitting” ageing as if it is a game of chess: “Three Tiers to biological escape velocity: The quest to outwit aging”. It also repeats the same non-existent affiliation, plus the ‘Full Spectrum Biologics’. Raymond can apparently teleport:

On yet another paper, “Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and the sirtuins caution: Pro-cancer functions”, Raymond invents yet another affiliation:

This time to the so-called “Helium-3 Biotech South Perth Western Australia Australia.”.

It is clearly evident that not only is Raymond not native to Australia, with incorrect spelling and broken English, but they invent whatever imaginary affiliations that suit whatever BS paper they are writing — including one blaming those critical of the vaccine cult.

One moment they’re ‘chief science officer’ for a biologics company for a vaccine, the next they’re part of a non-existent ‘school of aging’ in Australia using a non-Australian spelling, then a “Helium-3 Biotech” shell company. These are three completely distinct and unrelated fields of study, and at no point is “Raymond” required to divulge their own qualifications.

Apparently living at an address with a science-sounding business name now counts as a ‘qualification’ for publication.

It is clearly evident that this “Raymond D Palmer” is a fake identity, which any peer reviewer could spot with half an effort if they tried. Why haven’t they?

The ‘Peer-Review’ Outlet Is Shady Too

The Daily Beagle attempted to find contact details for the ‘BioMedicine’ outlet that is reportedly based in “Taipei”, in order to raise a query as to why they were publishing what appeared to be a paper by someone with a clearly fake identity and no real credentials nor evidence.

It’s particularly curious why supposedly Australian based “Raymond Palmer”, would opt to publish through this far more obscure, non-local outlet in Taiwan.

Perhaps they’re exploiting the unfamiliarity of the Taiwanese with Australian businesses in order to get their low quality drivel through the backdoor? Or perhaps this particular “peer-review” outlet doesn’t actually do any real peer-review and simply republishes whatever for a fee.

With the exception of a very tiny link to the parent company elsevier’s copyright infringement email, there were no forms of contact provided by the journal to notify of things like error or fraud, unlike most other legitimate peer-review outlets, which raises the suspicion they’re involved and enabling these low quality, unreviewed papers.

The outlet claims to be hosted by ‘China Medical University’, and when contacted over why they were hosting a paper that clearly had not been correctly vetted, they mysteriously failed to respond. The so-called ‘peer-reviewed’ ‘paper’ is still up with no corrections, suggesting CMU have no interest in rectifying fraudulent data.

Fraudulent Peer Review Launders Through NIH

In a desperate attempt to give itself a thin veneer of credibility, this so-called ‘peer review’ outlet has laundered the paper through the NIH website, giving the false impression it has been properly vetted.

Raymond’s ‘conflict of interest’ statement on the NIH also reads like broken English that has failed basic assessment — repeating the phrase ‘conflict of interest’ twice, with no punctuation — and thus shows as a red flag it has not been properly peer-reviewed by an editor or peer. The fact there’s only one author is particularly damning.

For contrast, here is a properly written conflict of interest statement (note the usage of punctuation and the more descriptive address):

This is proof that the vaccine industry will engage in fraud and gamification of the peer-review system, with so-called “peer-review” outlets turning a blind eye for money and at the expense of misleading the public and killing them with bad medical advice.

The Daily Beagle was the first media outlet to bring you EMA leak document coverage, even when all other outlets refused or dropped the ball. Sponsor truthful reporting, become a paying subscriber:

Think others ought to know about this?

Or leave a comment giving your thoughts below: