Ukrainian Cargo Plane Carrying Nuclear Weapons Crashes

Media oddly avoidant despite evident clues

You probably have already read relatively tepid reports by media outlets, such as the Telegraph declaring it was ‘carrying weapons’ or that it was ‘carrying landmines’:

Ukrainian cargo plane carrying weapons crashes in Greece killing all onboard

The Ukrainian-operated Antonov was carrying landmines from Serbia to Bangladesh when it crashed in Greece

However, this covers up arguably one of the most explosive stories in relation to the Ukraine war. Nuclear weapons.

Quoting Aljazeera they note something extremely odd for a plane ‘just’ carrying landmines and weapons. They remark in their title it has ‘hazardous materials’, which is also repeated in their YouTube video (screenshot below):

Their article was since changed to simply say:

Ukrainian cargo plane carrying weapons crashes in Greece

But if you look at their article URL it still reports the original title:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/7/17/cargo-plane-carrying-hazardous-material-crashes-in-greece

Quoting with added emphasis: “cargo-plane-carrying-hazardous-material-crashes-in-greece”. Evidently trying to cover the tracks of something major having gone down here.

Despite the surreptitious change, the body of the article remains the same, talking about a ‘hazardous material’. You could be forgiven if you thought it was ‘landmines’, but the type of people they’re sending includes the Atomic Energy Commission, quoting again, with emphasis:

According to state-run TV, the army, explosives experts and Greek Atomic Energy Commission staff will approach the area after it is deemed safe, as fears of the toxicity of the cargo forced them to stay away.

Seeing as the Atomic Energy Commission have no expertise to offer on supposedly just “landmines”, why are they there? Unless of course it includes nuclear materials, which are toxic (not a trait of explosives). And we already know the plane was carrying weapons, so this could only mean one thing: nuclear weapons.

Reinforcing Suspicions

Reinforcing this suspicion, Aljazeera vaguely allude to some ‘special equipment’ and ‘measuring instruments’:

Fire brigade official Marios Apostolidis told reporters: “Men from the fire service with special equipment and measuring instruments approached the point of impact of the aircraft and had a close look at the fuselage and other parts scattered in the fields.”

Measuring equipment sounds suspiciously like Geiger counters, which measures the amount of radiation in the area. There isn’t really any other types of ‘measuring equipment’ which would involve both an ‘atomic’ agency and toxicity.

Now before you say it’s firefighting equipment, that wouldn’t be ‘special’ for the fire brigade to own firefighting equipment. What would be special is a hazardous response to an unusual material. In the UK, the fire brigade are tasked with dealing with hazardous materials as well as fires. This also includes dealing with, as it turns out, nuclear materials.

A lot of countries, Greece included, follow a similar model of having the fire brigade deal with hazardous materials on-site. What isn’t typical, however, is inviting the Atomic Energy Commission. Atomic is an older choice of word meaning ‘nuclear’, and all they can advise on is nuclear materials. Landmines my butt.

If this didn’t raise suspicion enough, Aljazeera also reported there was a ‘smell’ and that people were advised to keep windows shut (much like our own nuclear advisory rebuttal) and wear masks:

As a strong smell emanated from the crash site, a coordinating committee made up of municipal, police and fire service officials asked inhabitants of the adjoining areas to take precautions. They were asked to keep their windows shut all night and advised not to leave their homes and to wear masks.

It even notes ‘breathing issues’ because of ‘toxic fumes’.

Two firefighters were taken to the hospital early on Sunday with breathing issues because of the toxic fumes.

Uh huh. Just ask yourself, given firefighters have their own oxygen tanks (because, you know, they fight fires, and also it is used in chemical situations), how exactly they are having ‘breathing issues’?

If they were wearing a full suit of isolated respirator equipment and they still got ill with “breathing problems”, that’s a major red flag that someone is lying, and it’s more likely radioactive ionising energy made them ill instead.

Overly Specific Denial

David DesRoches, a professor at the National Defense University, trying to excuse the highly suspicious circumstances in a way that sounds even more suspicious, tried to deny Ukraine was up to anything fishy:

“This isn’t some shady, fly-by-night [operation]; it’s an established, well-accepted practice – although they are not subject to some of the same scrutiny a western country would be, they are not part of any European institutions,” he said. “But are a known quantity”.

What Aljazeera failed to mention, and certainly even more curious to ask why they even quoted the man, is that the National Defense University is financed by the United States Department of Defense, literally listed on the US government site as the Department of Defense being the ‘parent agency’ to the “National Defense University”, and thus, so is David DesRoches.

You could not have picked a worse conflict of interest to quote here if you tried in an effort to cover up. If anything, the Department of Defense trying to cover for a ‘totally normal’ flight just reinforces what is evidently Ukraine smuggling nuclear weapons in a clearly abnormal situation. Why were they trying to ship nuclear weapons to Bangladesh?

If you like my work, be sure to support it by sharing with as many people as possible, subscribing or even becoming a supporter. Thank you!

Have you own insights to add?

Want more articles like this?