Which MPs Should Be PM?

The fate of the entire world is at stake

Jul 10, 2022

The following list is ordered from perceived ‘better’ to ‘worse’, although some are equally terrible in different ways.

Yes

Steve Baker. Why?

Steve Baker formed the “Covid Recovery Group” (CRG) who were largely critical of government overreach during the Pandemic. He even accurately described the UK government as full of “self-interested sycophancy”, and wanted to champion more libertarian ideals

Although he did parrot the line in support of the vaccines, he was verbally critical of the vaccine passports, to the point the Health and Safety Executive tried to flag him for ‘misinformation’, only to later apologise. Steve Baker wasn’t just words, either, he was one of only 96 MPs who voted against the UK government’s Plan B restrictions, making him a salwart defender of freedom.

Baker’s formation of the CRG shows he’s able to proactively formulate plans, organise and lead groups, especially ones with alternative, original strategies. Capabilities much needed in a PM facing the current crisis.

He was also part of the European Research Group (ERG), who were critical of the EU and supported Brexit, showing he has a history of backing the people’s vote, and not the whims of bureaucrats.

Those critical of establishment might feel Steve Baker does not go far enough, however he’s one of the better candidates in a shortlist rife with a cesspool of establishment corruption. Unfortunately, rumour has it he has already ruled himself out; I still think he should run. He could still choose to do so.

Christopher Chope. Why?

Christopher was the sole MP to have sponsored the Covid-19 Vaccine Damage Bill, even holding a debate on the topic and making semi-decent arguments. Christopher also voted against the UK government’s Plan B restrictions, making him a good candidate for not only defending people’s freedom, but also their safety from injury from corrupt pharmaceutical companies.

Chope would represent someone who is willing to follow the evidence, show concern for the voters and defy peer pressure and conformism that would otherwise try to make him do a bad job. The only reason he’s not higher on the list is because Steve Baker has a broader subset of skills suitable for leadership. He’d likely make a great Health Secretary, however. Chope has not announced any plans to run.

Desmond Swayne. Why?

Although Swayne took the defective COVID-19 shot, he was heavily critical of the government’s mandates and inaccurate COVID-19 figures, and enraged the dishonest media enough they tried to slander him as “spreading misinformation”. Anyone who pisses off establishment, corporatist media is usually a good sign.

Swayne also supports people’s freedom to elect whoever they want, including people perceived as “racists and misogynists”, and is clearly a proponent of absolute representative democracy, rather than stereotyping media attacks, which is a good thing.

Swayne also criticised Boris Johnson over Partygate. He has a history of being critical of the LGBTQ lobby, although unfortunately he’s apologised for this. On migration he declared ‘Britain is full’.

The sad part here, is despite Swayne’s history of being pro-freedom and anti-propaganda, he’s very advanced in age, which runs the risk he might be forced to retire early due to ill health. He’d make a great deputy leader, however, or even possibly a semi-decent head of the Home Office. Swayne has not announced any plans to run, but could opt to do so.

Esther McVey. Why?

One of the original Brexiteers to back Leave, McVey has a historic record for being on the right side of history. She opposed the NHS vaccine mandates, going so far as openly criticising Sajid Javid and voting against them, although she has aired support for COVID-19 shots in general, which is why she’s not higher on this list.

During her time working at the Department of Work and Pensions (read: welfare benefits), she worked to curtail the exploitation of the system by migrants, meaning she ironically did more on migration than the Home Office’s Priti Patel.

She has been critical of the government’s ‘obsession with COVID’, although only in the sense it was causing children to miss other vaccines, which makes her sound uncomfortably like a pharmaceutical stooge. Frustratingly she is one of the “better” candidates solely because she doesn’t mindlessly tow the government line and there don’t appear to be any alarming financial conflicts of interest.

Meh

Suella Braverman. Why?

She’s largely an unknown, which works against her. MPs are more often than not (see below), terrible candidates.

She does have the backing of Desmond Swayne and Steve Baker, two people who The Daily Beagle thinks are suitable for PM, however they may not have necessarily done their research as Suella Braverman voted for vaccine passports, despite Swayne and Baker’s opposition to it.

She is an Attorney General, and she led the European Research Group (ERG) before Jacob Rees-Mogg did.

When I contacted Steve Baker to encourage him to run as PM, he gave a statement he was flattered by all the support he received, however he unwaveringly supported Suella because:

When finally even I wobbled about backing Brexit in name only, Suella stood firm. We only have Brexit today because of what we did then. It wouldn’t have happened without her

Her involvement in the ERG reinforces this claim, however I’m not sure any one person can take singular credit for achieving it, and there are other pro-brexiteers with better track records (McVey, for example).

She earns the ‘meh’ rating because her vote in favour of vaccine passports is still alarming, as either she didn’t read the bill (which means she wasn’t doing her job as MP), or she is okay with medical tyranny, which is not a good trait to have.

Jacob Rees-Mogg. Why?

Capable of holding his own in a Parliamentary debate, to the point there are compilations of his rebuttals online, Jacob Rees-Mogg demonstrates a sharp wit often lacking in MPs.

One of the original Brexiteers, Rees-Mogg has a history of standing by the people’s vote, even originally leading the European Research Group (ERG), a pro-Brexit group critical of the EU who blocked Thesera May’s terrible withdrawal bill no less than three times.

He also lambasted both vaccine passports and vaccine certificates publicly, but behind the scenes he voted in favour of vaccine passports. This vote makes Rees-Mogg untrustworthy from a freedom standpoint despite the relatively decent track record as it suggests his words and actions don’t align, earning him a ‘meh’ rating.

Jake Berry. Why?

Jake Berry ruled himself out, that said, he leads Northern Research Group (NRG) whose task is to try to connect with Labour voters in the North, and there’s nothing overly damning in his history besides regurgitating the usual government rhetoric. He likely could have bridged the voting divide, but being an unknown, earns the ‘meh’ rating.

Liz Truss. Why?

Liz Truss voted for vaccine passports. She amazingly just barely avoids the ‘No’ rating because she was willing to threaten the EU with invoking Article 16, and clearly isn’t likely to be bullied by the EU if she takes power.

That said, she had been criticised by the Northern Irish DUP for her handling of the Irish Protocol and does not seem to be willing to take Northern Irish views onboard, likely indicating her stubbornness has the downside of also being close-minded.

Ben Wallace. Why?

Unable to successfully operate WiFi, Ben Wallace’s ineptitude with technology would rule him out as a PM, unable to do anything remotely useful. That said, he doesn’t appear to have voted for vaccine passports (he didn’t oppose them, either), just barely earning him the ‘meh’ rating. Thankfully I don’t have to write the dirt on Ben as he’s already ruled himself out.

No

Penny Mordaunt. Why?

Penny Mordaunt is completely immature and irresponsible, literally saying ‘cock’ multiple times in a Parliamentary speech because someone dared her to. Would she also fire off nuclear weapons as part of a dare as PM?

She’s a UK Navy reservist, part of the UK military, and thus is likely to advocate for yet more perpetual wars, and, worse, is pro-transgender, which means she is likely to advocate for the butchering of children’s genitals and the introduction of insane policies that put women at risk in bathrooms, shelter homes and prisons.

She is evidentially very short-sighted, wholly irresponsible. Sadly, there are Tory MPs with an even worse track record than Penny.

Grant Shapps. Why?

Grant Shapps backed mandatory vaccination policies for government workers to return to work, essentially trying to purge anyone who wasn’t a vaccine stooge and eliminate people’s freedom and consent on medical choice. He voted for vaccine passports to that effect. He isn’t the worst vaccine tyrant on this list either.

Matt Hancock. Why?

Having an affair in the offices, Matt Hancock is one of the slimiest toads going, parroting WEF mantras about the “fourth industrial revolution”, even giving a speech at Davos. The WEF even kindly reserved a page for this closeted globalist. Determined to enforce medical tyranny, he even voted for vaccine passports, and during a pandemic his “mate down the pub” ended up with a COVID PPE contract.

His sole call to fame is that he cleared £13 billion of the NHS’ debt; given this just involves throwing money at it, The Daily Beagle doesn’t think this warrants praise.

Thankfully he ruled himself out. Unfortunately, there’s another that didn’t…

Tom Tugendhat. Why?

Sounding like ‘Turd-in-hat’, this tyrant turd encouraged workplaces to ban “antivaxxers” if they refused to take the poisonous shots. He’s also a Remainer, who also, in what can only be described as an unhinged Russophobic rant demanded that:

We can freeze Russian assets in this country – all of them. We can expel Russian citizens – all of them.

What, even the Russians who we’re giving shelter to, from Russia itself? Even the neutral citizens? What?

Turd-in-hat also likes to bandwagon against anyone called an anti-semite, whether the accusation is true or not:

So when philosopher Roger Scruton [...] smeared by the New Statesman’s George Eaton as an anti-Semite, Tugendhat called for Scruton to be fired on the spot. When it later emerged that Scruton had been misrepresented by Eaton, [...] Tugendhat could barely bring himself to say sorry.

He seems to like expelling and barring people who don’t agree with him which can only be described as the Conservative version of cancel culture. An unhinged, aggressive man who leaps to conclusions when we’re on the verge of nuclear war with Russia is the last thing we need as PM right now.

Rishi Sunak. Why?

Mainly seeing things from purely a financial perspective, Rishi floated the idea that data from vaccine passports “might” help the British economy, which is alarming because it suggests he’s not entirely bothered with medical tyranny if it’s financially beneficial, risking a ‘purely by the numbers’ Gordon Brown situation.

Despite this, Rishi Sunak does not appear on the list of MPs that voted for the vaccine passports (this doesn’t mean he voted against it, though), however he did allocate £55 billion to finance the shots, and has a huge financial conflict of interest, as one of his hedge funds is heavily invested in Moderna, one of the makers of the mRNA shots.

Not sufficiently deep-throating the vaccine lobby far enough, Rishi also went public to insist his daughters role models were Oxford vaccine scientist Sarah Gilbert. Yeah right, pull the other one Rishi.

The last thing we need is a PM with a giant financial conflict-of-interest to the very corrupt pharmaceutical companies that healthcare are currently trying to fight. It’s very likely he’d be an utter disaster for the NHS.

Priti Patel. Why?

Earning her nickname of ‘Priti Useless’, she is accused of bullying within Parliament. A daughter of Ugandan Indian migrants, she has a major conflict of interest when it comes to securing the UK’s borders, and it shows, with the UK government failing to reduce migration whilst Priti Patel was in-charge of the Home Office, showing her utter incompetence.

More concerned about fining vaccine queues jumpers, Priti Patel instead worked to get the toxic COVID-19 shots in arms, a role supposed to be done by the Department of Health and Social Care, deploying roughly a thousand vaccination sites, urging ethnic minorities to go get it. She even voted for vaccine passports to try to force it on people.

It gets worse, because she also has financial conflict of interests, lobbying the UK government over Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) contracts on behalf of a healthcare firm.

A Daily Mail investigation has revealed Ms Patel spoke with cabinet minister Michael Gove over a £20million mask contract for Pharmaceuticals Direct Ltd last April.
She had been approached by her former advisor Samir Jassal, a Tory councillor in Kent, but made no mention of him or his links to PDL in her lobbying to Mr Gove.
Health Secretary Matt Hancock rejected the proposal, saying the masks were 'not suitable for the NHS', but weeks later PDL were awarded a no-competition £102.6m contract to supply a better type of mask.

This isn’t surprising as she previously worked as a “spin doctor” (read: propagandist) for tobacco firms, trying to defend their image against Burmese worker exploitation, and lobbying to try to reduce tobacco regulations in the EU. She’d give even Jeremy Hunt a run for his money on ‘Most Evil Bastard of the Year’. Ironically, like Jeremy Hunt, she claims to support Direct Democracy, but hasn’t actually done anything to implement it.

It is very likely her lacklusture, unoriginal, half-assed policies and corrupt financial conflict-of-interest practices would likewise manifest themselves if she became PM, which coupled with her toxic attitude would literally be the worst attributes.

Jeremy Hunt. Why?

Voting for vaccine passports, this medical tyrant is infamous for his mishandling of the NHS, butchering and privatising it in such a hamfisted way, that it makes globalist Matt Hancock clearing the £13 billion NHS debt look relatively benign in comparison.

He turned the NHS’ winter-only crisis to a year round crisis, according to the BMJ, and floated the idea of banning patients walking into A&E, because apparently being critically injured isn’t sufficient grounds for admittance to A&E, and was beaten successfully in court twice over his overreach of powers, handing £2 billion in contracts to Jeffery Epstein embroiled Richard Branson’s Virgin Care. Even if he supposedly supports Direct Democracy (he hasn’t shown any initiative in getting Direct Democracy legislation passed, however).

It is very likely he’d butcher and sell-off large swathes of the UK in a similar manner, and is not suitable for PM.

Nadhim Zahawi. Why?

A multi-millionaire investigated by the National Crime Agency, whose wife owns a £3.5 million estate and was buying up warehouses for storage in Devon whilst he was negotiating Brexit (a move that should have been a violation of Ministerial code of conduct rules), claimed £5,822 expenses for electricity for his riding school stables and a yard manager’s mobile home, he is the eptiome of corrupt corpocrate theiving from taxpayers.

Nadhim Zahawi has ties to Gulf Keystone Petroleum, and was the self-professed literal “vaccines minister” (as if corrupt vaccine industry lobbyists needed any more representation in Parliament), voting for vaccine passports, with bills in-place to enforce them in large scale gatherings.

This was despite previously lying and saying that wasn’t something the government were going to do, a move that caused national outrage demanding the sacking of Zahawi. He most recently tried to centralise control of schools under the government and expand government authoritarianism, a move that also sparked outrage forcing another U-turn.

His propensity to lying on serious issues of medical freedom, greed with taxpayers money and huge financial conflicts of interest in relation to energy and vaccines makes him an extremly poor candidate as PM.

Sajid Javid. Why?

Nicknamed ‘Saddo Jabid’, Sajid Javid voted for vaccine passports, and voted for the winter lockdowns. Publicly he claimed to criticise mandatory vaccines, calling them “unethical”, and yet called for young people to adopt them and is on record stating vaccination was a requirement for troops to be deployed. His stance was such it prompted one doctor to challenge him.

He was accused of lying about the Valneva vaccine contract, where he claimed Valneva was in ‘breach of contract’, but then claimed it was due to the MHRA not approving it instead.

Javid has a financial conflict of interest in having shares and a consulting salary with an American AI technology firm after promoting AI technology within the NHS. He also previously had an “advisory” role at J.P. Morgan, and wasn’t even domiciled to the UK for 6 years.

It was reported Sajid Javid’s brother, deputy assistant commissioner Bas Javid oversaw the Partygate compliant. Even if he hadn’t, Sajid Javid having such influence in the police is very concerning. He thwarted Dominic Cummings efforts to inject money into the North of England.

Sajid Javid is strongly pro-Israel, given he has family ties to the region, even going so far as having a honeymoon in Israel.

Whilst the other Tory MPs are terrible in specific domains, Javid literally has a wide array of terrible traits. Not only is he rabidly pro-vaccines, with financial ties to both a banking firm and an AI tech firm (two giant red flags), his ties to Israel present a major threat of foreign influence within the UK, and with his family effectively infiltrating other parts of government, poses a huge top-heavy power risk compared to any other candidate on this list.

The Daily Beagle